The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resilience in transportation systems: a systematic review and future directions
Open accessAbstract
The Belt and Road (B&R) initiative was introduced by the Chinese government to promote the worldwide economic development and multilateral cooperation between China and the associated countries. As a crucial part of global supply chains, transportation plays a key role to ensure the implementation of the B&R. Safety is one of the issues with great importance in transportation research. However, its foci have been expanded from traditional risk through security to resilience and sustainability. Resilience has attracted considerable interests from both researchers and practitioners across different research domains in recent years. Various studies have been conducted on transportation resilience from different perspectives. Consequently, different definitions have been developed to define and describe resilience. This paper presents a systematic review on transportation resilience with emphasis on its definitions, characteristics, and research methods applied in different transportation systems/contexts. It aims to figure out what transportation resilience is and what kind of essential characters it usually has. More importantly, research challenges are analysed and a future research agenda on the resilience of transportation systems is proposed. This paper will provide comprehensive insights into understanding the transportation resilience, as well as establish new horizons for relevant research topics within the context of the B&R.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821
A review of definitions and measures of system resilience
Hosseini, S., Barker, K., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006 · Cited by 1,892
Designing Resilient, Sustainable Systems
Fiksel, J. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0344819 · Cited by 831
Developing Resilience in Children Who are in Public Care: The educational psychology perspective
Dent, R. J., & Cameron, R. J. S. (2003) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/0266736032000061170 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Afrin, T., & Yodo, N. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12114660 · Cited by 466
Resilience of Transportation Systems: Concepts and Comprehensive Review
Zhou, Y., Wang, J., & Yang, H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2018.2883766 · Cited by 455
Resilience in railway transport systems: a literature review and research agenda
Bešinović, N. (2020) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2020.1728419 · Cited by 389
Urban Transportation Networks Resilience: Indicators, Disturbances, and Assessment Methods
Serdar, M. Z., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2022) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103452 · Cited by 292
The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Resilience of Sustainable Mobility in Sicily
Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Skoufas, A., Akgün, N., Ticali, D., & Tesoriere, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12218829 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, C., Yang, Z., Zhang, D., Yan, X., & Fan, S.
- Venue
- Transport Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-10-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 479-498
- ISSN
- 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5327
- OpenAlex
- W2764342288
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 37.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resilience in transportation systems: a systematic review and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
- The paper
- Wan, C., Yang, Z., Zhang, D., Yan, X., & Fan, S. (2018). Resilience in transportation systems: a systematic review and future directions. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.