The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resilience in railway transport systems: a literature review and research agenda
Open accessAbstract
Critical infrastructure networks, such as transport and power networks, are essential for the functioning of a society and economy. The rising transport demand increases the congestion in railway networks and thus they become more interdependent and more complex to operate. Also, an increasing number of disruptions due to system failures as well as climate changes can be expected in the future. As a consequence, many trains are cancelled and excessively delayed, and thus, many passengers are not reaching their destinations which compromises customers need for mobility. Currently, there is a rising need to quantify impacts of disruptions and the evolution of system performance. This review paper aims to set-up a field-specific definition of resilience in railway transport and gives a comprehensive, up-to-date review of railway resilience papers. The focus is on quantitative approaches. The review analyses peer-reviewed papers in Web of Science and Scopus from January 2008 to August 2019. The results show a steady increase of the number of published papers in recent years. The review classifies resilience metrics and approaches. It has been recognised that system-based metrics tend to better capture effects on transport services and transport demand. Also, mathematical optimization shows a great potential to assess and improve resilience of railway systems. Alternatively, data-driven approaches could be potentially used for detailed ex-post analysis of past disruptions. Finally, several rising future scientific topics are identified, spanning from learning from historical data, to considering interdependent critical systems and community resilience. Practitioners can also benefit from the review to understand a common terminology, recognise possible applications for assessing and designing resilient railway transport systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities
Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O'Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2003) · Earthquake Spectra · doi:10.1193/1.1623497 · Cited by 5,440
Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090910954873 · Cited by 2,530
A review of definitions and measures of system resilience
Hosseini, S., Barker, K., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006 · Cited by 1,892
Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems – A discussion of recent research
Mattsson, L.-G., & Jenelius, E. (2015) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002 · Cited by 846
An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done
Berdica, K. (2002) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/s0967-070x(02)00011-2 · Cited by 761
Resilience and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure: Toward a Unified Approach
Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D. M., Ummenhofer, T., & Zinke, T. (2014) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000177 · Cited by 589
How to write a literature review paper?
Wee, B. V., & Banister, D. (2016) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456 · Cited by 578
Resilience of Transportation Systems: Concepts and Comprehensive Review
Zhou, Y., Wang, J., & Yang, H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2018.2883766 · Cited by 455
Resilience in transportation systems: a systematic review and future directions
Wan, C., Yang, Z., Zhang, D., Yan, X., & Fan, S. (2018) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532 · Cited by 440
The complexity and robustness of metro networks
Derrible, S., & Kennedy, C. (2010) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2010.04.008 · Cited by 438
Cited by
COVID-19 and Public Transportation: Current Assessment, Prospects, and Research Needs
Tirachini, A., & Cats, O. (2020) · Journal of Public Transportation · doi:10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1 · Cited by 781
A literature review of Artificial Intelligence applications in railway systems
Tang, R., De Donato, L., Bes̆inović, N., Flammini, F., Goverde, R. M. P., Lin, Z., Liu, R., Tang, T., Vittorini, V., & Wang, Z. (2022) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2022.103679 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Bešinović, N.
- Venue
- Transport Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-02-16
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 457-478
- ISSN
- 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5327
- OpenAlex
- W3005537099
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 21.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resilience in railway transport systems: a literature review and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01441647.2020.1728419
- The paper
- Bešinović, N. (2020). Resilience in railway transport systems: a literature review and research agenda. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1728419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.