The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The implications of the sharing economy for transport
Abstract
The sharing economy has gained a lot of attention in recent years. Despite the substantial growth in shared services, its impact overall on transport is unclear. This paper analyses the literature on sharing in transport and includes government and consultant reports, websites and academic journals. The drivers of ride-sharing, car-sharing, car-pooling and freight-sharing are largely economic and convenience related for participants. Trust, technology platforms and the trend to avoid ownership of assets are facilitating factors in its growth. Over-regulation, inconsistent quality of service and the need for recommendation are potential barriers. The transport journals in particular are relatively slow to research this topic with more focusing on bike-sharing than other modes of vehicle sharing. The paper discusses the impact of sharing on transport suggesting it is likely to be part of a solution to transport problems and congestion perhaps in combination with other developments such as driverless vehicles. It also warns of the dangers of over-regulation and under-regulation. The future will require holistic transport strategies that consider sharing options and will require government departments to work cooperatively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875 · cited 1×
“Web 2.0 developments have seen the increase in user-generated content and how information is created and consumed (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialGrounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide
Urquhart, C. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781526402196 · Cited by 1,041
Introduction to the special issue social commerce: A research framework for social commerce
Liang, T.-P., & Turban, E. (2011) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415160201 · Cited by 960
Cited by
Taiebat, M., Brown, A. L., Safford, H. R., Qu, S., & Xu, M. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b00127 · Cited by 334
Enhanced Mobility With Connectivity and Automation: A Review of Shared Autonomous Vehicle Systems
Zhao, L., & Malikopoulos, A. A. (2022) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2019.2953526 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Standing, C., Standing, S., & Biermann, S.
- Venue
- Transport Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 226-242
- ISSN
- 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5327
- OpenAlex
- W2792760871
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The implications of the sharing economy for transport. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01441647.2018.1450307
- The paper
- Standing, C., Standing, S., & Biermann, S. (2019). The implications of the sharing economy for transport. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1450307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.