Cited by 156Transportation and Mobility InnovationsUrban Transport and AccessibilitySmart Cities and Technologies

Planning the driverless city

Legacy, Crystal, Ashmore, David, Scheurer, Jan, Stone, John, Curtis, Carey·2019·Transport Reviews

Abstract

AV technologies have the potential to transform urban landscapes and existing transport systems and networks. Yet, the utopian imaginary of reduced automobile ownership and a new shared economic future sits in tension with suggestions that car dependency, urban sprawl and transport inaccessibility will be exacerbated. The issues are situated in a complex governance landscape involving an influential private sector who are increasingly setting the agenda. The public sector may be forced into reacting to the new innovations by information technology and automobile companies as they are introduced into existing built environments. Drawing on an extensive literature base and interviews with public sector planners, this paper reveals the conceptual gaps in the framing of AV technology – the prospects and limits – and how these are conceived. The paper raises questions about the role urban planning can play in the rollout of AVs in order to anticipate and mediate unwanted built environment and socio-spatial impacts, as well as reconciling the ambition of transport innovation with the public purpose of planning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01441647.2018.1466835

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Merging of private and public transportation is expected.

    “Legacy et al. (2018) expect merging of private and public transportation.”

    From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Legacy et al., 2018

  • The role of public transport authorities will change from owning and managing transportation assets to managing SAV service providers to ensure equitable and sustainable transport service and curtail possible vested interests of corporations.

    “Further, the role of public transport authorities will change from owning and managing the transportation assets to managing SAV service providers to ensure equitable and sustainable transport service and also to curtail the possible vested interests of corporations.”

    From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Legacy et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Legacy, C., Ashmore, D., Scheurer, J., Stone, J., & Curtis, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Legacy, Crystal
Venue
Transport Reviews
Published
2018-04-20
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
84-102
ISSN
  • 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5327
OpenAlex
W2799293422
Cited by
156
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 4
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transport Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, urban planning, transport governance, car dependence, urban sprawl, transport accessibility, shared mobility, public sector planning, private sector influence, socio-spatial impacts, built environment, transport innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review