Cited by 4Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationSharing Economy and Platforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 11 of the 66 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

A cross-cultural study of nonprofit self-organized ridesharing

Open access
Shoshany-Tavory, Sharon, Trop, Tamar, Shiftan, Yoram·2024·Transportation

Abstract

Nonprofit ridesharing presents an underutilized opportunity for increasing transportation sustainability, as well as users' economic and social benefits, while reducing adverse environmental impacts. However, while app-based ridesharing has achieved only modest uptake, mostly limited to longer trips, in certain contexts, self-organized ridesharing (SORS) has shown significant achievements, even for the challenging short- and mid-range commuting trips. Still, knowledge regarding the key elements and mechanisms behind successful SORS is partial, hindering the ability to effectively leverage SORS diffusion and scaling potential. Following the premise that successful initiatives may provide learning opportunities, this study aims at narrowing this knowledge gap by performing a comparative cross-cultural systematic study of eight diverse SORS cases. The study uses a recently designed conceptual framework and multiple research methods (mainly online data exploration, personal interviews, observations, and documents analysis) to comprehensively examine SORSs' attributes and evolution stages and processes. Study findings highlight repeated patterns as well as the role of context, official actors, and local practices in shaping initiative's dynamics towards success. The study offers general and specific policy recommendations for supporting the early development, growth, and diffusion of SORS, as well as reflections on post pandemic ridesharing.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This cross-cultural comparative study examines eight nonprofit self-organized ridesharing (SORS) cases to identify recurring patterns in their emergence, operation, and diffusion. It finds that SORS success depends on contextual strains, chokepoints, triggering events, incentives, local practices, and social/organizational dynamics, with two main initiative types.

Key findings

  • Across eight cases in the USA, Canada, Brazil, and Israel, SORS emerged under similar strained conditions: congestion or parking shortages, poor transit, or no transit, often with chokepoint/corridor geography; enduring cases had accessible meeting points and backup transit. Two patterns appeared: type1 participatory/self-organized initiatives with mediators, and type2 activist-led initiatives with predefined norms.
  • Incentives varied: HOV3+ (USA1/2), 3+ priority parking (IL1), a canceled shuttle (IL2), solidarity (CA1), and expense sharing (BRA1/2). Recruitment thresholds included at least 180 daily participants, of whom 60 were drivers, to sustain a single USA2 line replication; at least 30 daily drivers for several weeks to start a new USA1 line; digital groups of 257 members remained sustainable (BRA1, IL2); and IL1 breakthrough occurred when total membership surpassed 80. BRA2 reached 75 daily rides within 2 months but fell to a small handful after 5 months.
  • Diffusion occurred in BRA1’s multiple groups, BRA2 as a BRA1 offspring, CA1 to Bowen Lift, IL1 to a general RS group, and IL2 from a canceled shuttle. USA2’s North Berkeley line had 220 daily rides, while the area served 6,000 riders per day. Diffusion failures included Alexandria VA, USA3/Haliburton, and IL1 replication. A 2010 Bay Bridge toll led to a $1 rider contribution and a 10% participation reduction.
  • The conceptual framework was revised by adding a perturbed state, transition processes, the importance of mediators and an arena, and sense of community.

Methods

  • Qualitative multiple-case comparative design with eight SORS cases selected for cultural, geographic, temporal, and technological diversity across the USA, Canada, Brazil, and Israel; operation periods ranged from the late 1970s to since 2017, and technology reliance ranged from none to a self-made app.
  • Data sources included digital footprints from WhatsApp, Facebook, and forums; 12 semi-structured interviews with users and activists; direct observations of IL1 and USA2; documents; prior studies; and popular media. Collection continued until early 2020, with limited sampling during COVID-19.
  • Analysis used abductive framework-guided content and thematic analysis, statistical meta-analysis of tagged messages and timelines, cross-case comparison, and an Object Process Methodology architecture.

Limitations

  • Stated: the phenomenon is hidden and data availability forced different source types per case, risking bias or misrepresentation; sampling was somewhat comfort-based; mostly persistent cases were selected, except USA3, limiting insight into failed attempts; only 12 interviews were conducted; success and impact are hard to estimate because rides are private and alternative modes are inferred; socio-demographic assessment is difficult when platforms lack profiles. The authors argue repeated patterns support generalization.
  • Evident from the text: data coverage is uneven across cases, older cases rely more on secondary sources, commercial apps are not systematically compared, and the qualitative design cannot quantify causal effects.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11116-022-10347-z

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

11 of 66 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Commercial app-based ridesharing has had only modest, context-dependent uptake, largely limited to longer trips and areas with many users.

    “Even the recent prosperity of sharing-economy commercially-driven RS initiatives, such as BlaBlaCar (Shaheen et al. 2017), or Scoop (Martin et al. 2020) resulted in modest and contextually dependent uptake, restricting their applicability to longer trips and high concentration of users (Shen et al. 2021).”
    • Also stated in: § Literature review · plain
      “While some trials report substantial uptake, success depends on location (Martin et al. 2020), mainly for longer-distance trips and for expense-sharing schemes (Finger et al. 2017; Rafiq and Mitra 2020; Shen et al. 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Shaheen et al. 2017 source
    • cites Martin et al. 2020 source

      The citation to Martin et al. (2020) is attached to Scoop as an example, while the sentence cites Shen et al. for the broader uptake claim. The available report description identifies a BART carpool-to-transit evaluation but does not name Scoop; a search for “Scoop” found no matching passage in our copy. It therefore cannot verify that this report concerns Scoop. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Shen et al. 2021 source
  • Premisecitation

    Self-organized ridesharing has achieved localized success in multiple contexts, including for short- and mid-distance trips.

    “Concurrently, nonprofit self-organized ridesharing (SORS) initiatives have achieved localized success in multiple contexts, even for the short- mid-distance range.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Shoshany-Tavory et al. 2020 source
    • cites Burris et al. 2012

      The Introduction describes successful, grassroots ridesharing systems in three cities, supporting localized success in multiple settings. The copy does not establish that these are nonprofit initiatives or that their success spans both short- and mid-distance trips; a figure caption describes a 27-mile HOV corridor, but not the full range of trip lengths. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Eskelinen and Venäläinen 2021 source

      The section “Ridesharing: self-organised mobility through Facebook groups” (p. 9) describes growing, not-for-profit ridesharing across about 160 Finnish groups serving different cities and routes. It does not establish that these groups served short- or mid-distance trips, or document success beyond the Finnish context. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    SORS complexity has economic, behavioral, technological, organizational, and transportation origins.

    “SORS complexity stems from economic, behavioral, technological, organizational, and transportation origins (Amey 2010), therefore, user-centric approach, where participants’ characteristics and motivations are explored, is deemed insufficient to explain contextual dependency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Amey 2010
  • Interpretationcitation

    The emerging communal-like collaborative consumption of SORS eliminates several activities associated with commercial RS, where participants follow consumerist or opportunistic sharing styles.

    “From transaction-costs perspective, the emerging communal-like collaborative-consumption of SORS, eliminates several of the activities associated with commercial RS, where participants follow consumerist or opportunistic sharing styles (Guyader 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guyader 2018 source

      The Findings passage (page not provided) identifies communal, consumerist and opportunistic styles of ridesharing, supporting the distinction between those styles. It does not say that SORS eliminates activities associated with commercial ridesharing or assess that claim from a transaction-cost perspective. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingnone given

    Conflicting perceptions are reflected in policy decisions, such as anti-paid-ride laws (e.g., Brazil and Israel ban on expense-sharing RS until recently) or anti-hitchhiking laws (e.g., in USA3, CA1).

    “These conflicting perceptions are reflected in policy decisions, such as anti-paid-ride laws (e.g., Brazil and Israel ban on expense-sharing RS until recently), or anti-hitchhiking laws (e.g., in USA3, CA1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 68
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 140
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Analyzing digital sources is gaining acceptance among multiple scholars for transportation and ridesharing research.

    “Analyzing such digital sources is gaining acceptance by multiple scholars for transportation and ridesharing exploration (e.g., Gal-Tzur et al. 2014; Li et al. 2019; Eskelinen and Venäläinen 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gal-Tzur et al. 2014 source
    • cites Li et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Eskelinen and Venäläinen 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    For commuting, nonprofit ridesharing can reduce vehicle-miles travelled, lower emissions and energy use, and improve average travel time.

    “Specifically, for commuting, RS may reduce vehicle-miles travelled, decrease emissions and energy consumption, and improve the average travel time (Minett and Pearce 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Minett and Pearce 2011 source

      Section 3.3 (p. 11) estimates that casual carpooling conserves fuel and identifies lower emissions and time saved as potential benefits. Section 2.2 (p. 4) also reports modeled commute-time savings. The paper does not establish a reduction in vehicle-miles traveled; Section 2.1 (p. 3) notes that casual carpooling may put more cars on the road when riders shift from public transport. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Easier-to-use locally adapted solutions reduce relative transaction costs, while low QoS is offset by harnessing a true sense of mutuality.

    “The easier-to-use locally adapted solutions reduces the relative transaction-costs, while low QoS is being offset by harnessing a true sense of mutuality (Guyader, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guyader, 2018 source

      The indexed English abstract says technology makes sharing easier and cheaper, and the Findings passage describes communal participation and pro-social relationships. Neither passage establishes that locally adapted solutions reduce relative transaction costs or that mutuality offsets low quality of service; searches for transaction costs and QoS found no such account. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Commercial apps may provide effective matching, but their use is associated with various cost-incurring activities.

    “Where commercial apps may provide effective matching, their use is associated with various cost-incurring activities, such as creating a profile, listing a ride, reserving a seat, negotiating terms and meeting places, riding together, monetary exchange, conversing, and rating peers (Guyader 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guyader 2018 source

      The Findings passage says the paper identifies 10 ridesharing activities, and the Purpose passage describes online platforms as facilitating peer-to-peer exchanges. The passages do not identify the listed activities or establish that they incur costs; they also do not assess how effectively commercial apps match riders. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Technology choice is derived from local orientation-WhatsApp serves IL cases, Facebook serves USA1 and the Finnish example, but some tech-savvy crowds opt for apps.

    “Technology choice is derived from the local orientation—WhatsApp serves the IL cases while Facebook serves the USA1 case and the Finnish example (Eskelinen and Venäläinen 2021), but some tech-savvy crowds would opt for apps.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eskelinen and Venäläinen 2021 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Unlike previous transportation semi-disasters that resulted in higher sharing, current shared-mobility fears grasp even the most dedicated communities and reduce ridesharing to nil.

    “Unlike previous transportation semi-disasters (rising oil prices, PT strikes), which resulted in higher sharing, the current shared-mobility fears (Barbieri et al. 2021) grasp even the most dedicated communities, reducing RS to nil.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barbieri et al. 2021 source

      The Results and discussion sections (Transportation perceptions; Changes to travel behavior, pages not provided) report perceived infection risks in public transport and reduced travel, including an increase in respondents who never used a car driven in company. They do not examine especially dedicated ridesharing communities or show that ridesharing fell to nil. The comparison with oil prices and transit strikes precedes the citation and is not clearly attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    All explored cases were stimulated by major recurring transportation problems: traffic congestion and parking shortage in USA1/2, parking unavailability and unsynchronized public transport in IL1/2, and low quality of public transport or no public transport in BRA1/2, USA3 and CA1.

    “All the explored cases were stimulated by some major recurring transportation problem, as follows: traffic congestion and parking shortage in USA1/2, parking unavailability and unsynchronized PT in IL1/2, and low QoS of PT or no-PT in BRA1/2, USA3 and CA1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Rural communities (CA1 and IL2), younger, needy, and flexible students (BRA1/2), and cultures of lower personal distance (IL1/2, BRA1/2) are more prone to share rides.

    “in general, rural communities (CA1 and IL2), younger, needy, and flexible students (BRA1/2), as well as cultures of lower personal distance (IL1/2, BRA1/2), are more prone to share rides.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The enduring SORS cases are situated at chokepoints: USA1 and USA2 at natural barriers, BRA1 and BRA2 on a secluded campus island, IL1 and IL2 on a single road to a rail station, and CA1 on an island connected by ferry.

    “USA1 and USA2 are defined by the few routes crossing a natural barrier (Potomac River and Bay bridge respectively); BRA1,2 serve the secluded campus on Fundão island; IL1/2 are connected via one road to the rail station; and CA1 island is connected to the mainland by a ferry.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    All enduring cases share a choke corridor or chokepoint structure, along which meeting points can be set to enable efficient ridesharing.

    “all the enduring cases share choke corridor or a chokepoint’ structure, along which meeting points can be set to enable efficient RS.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Competencies of mastering group dialog provided by widespread WhatsApp use in Israel and Brazil, as well as the collaborative meaning, are borrowed and used to support SORS.

    “The competencies of mastering group dialog, provided by the widespread WhatsApp use in Israel and Brazil (e.g., Culture Atlas, n.d.), as well as the collaborative meaning, are borrowed and used to support SORS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Culture Atlas, n.d.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In IL1, when members feared preferential parking closure, they had no direct channel to the rail authority and had to approach local politicians to contact the rail authority.

    “when IL1 feared preferential parking closure, members had to roundaboutly approach their local politicians to contact rail authority, as they had no direct channel to the rail authority.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Many initiatives respond to policy tools (e.g., HOV+3 or preferential parking) but tend to stay unassisted by official actors for extended periods.

    “while many initiatives respond to policy tools (e.g., HOV + 3 or preferential parking), they tend to stay unassisted by official actors for extended periods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Authorities differ in their perception of ridesharing and the policy tools they enact to effect it.

    “They differ in their perception of RS and the policy tools they enact to effect it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Participants with a stronger habit of car-use take the role of drivers, while riders are at least initially drawn from the public transport riders crowd (e.g., USA1,2).

    “participants with stronger habit of car-use take the role of drivers, while riders are at least initially drawn from the PT riders crowd (e.g., USA1,2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    While anonymity was a cornerstone of USA1 (LeBlanc 1999), technological platforms expose key personal data (profile or phone number), and users seem to relax some privacy requirements for better connectivity.

    “While anonymity was one of the cornerstones of USA1 (LeBlanc 1999), the technological platforms expose some key personal data (profile or phone number), and their users seem to relax some of their privacy requirements for better connectivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites LeBlanc 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingreasoning

    The invisibility of SORS raises effectiveness questions, specifically by transportation planners (IL1).

    “the invisibility of SORS raises effectiveness questions, specifically by transportation planners (IL1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    In cases where a prior vehicle withdrawal habit exists (e.g., train users of IL1/2 who plan to leave their car at the rail station), no such competition is evident, and users tend to alternate between driver and rider roles.

    “In cases where prior vehicle withdrawal habit exists (e.g., train users of ISR1,2 who plan to leave their car at the rail station), no such competition is evident, and users tend to alternate between driver and rider roles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The study's findings show repeated patterns and the influence of context, official actors, and local practices on how initiatives move toward success.

    “Study findings highlight repeated patterns as well as the role of context, official actors, and local practices in shaping initiative’s dynamics towards success.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Hitchhiking-like initiatives may be perceived as deviant, raising liability concerns (USA3).

    “hitchhiking-like initiatives may be perceived as deviant, raising liability concerns (USA3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Accessibility to chokepoints and defined meeting locations is provided through walking (IL1/2, BRA1/2, CA1) or by safe and available parking and accessible pickup locations (USA1/2).

    “Accessibility is provided to these chokepoints and the defined meeting locations through walking (in IL1/2, BRA1/2, CA1) or by safe and available parking and accessible pickup locations (in USA1/2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    BRA1, IL1, and IL2, which use the same type of platform but are otherwise unrelated, have similar message format and timing, differing mainly in allowed content.

    “The established ways of conduct of BRA1, IL11, and IL2, which use the same type of platform but are otherwise unrelated, include similar message format and timing, differing mainly in the allowed content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    In USA2, Kirshner's attempted matchmaking platform ended up being used as a community arena; in USA1, Leblanc wrote a book and established a website for information dissemination and community blog; in BRA1, an obscure individual created the first group but every member holds management privileges; and in IL1, the manager targeted a handful of cohabitants and seldom practices her role.

    “In USA2, for instance, Kirshner attempted matchmaking platform ended-up being used as a community arena; similarly, in USA1, optimization-driven Leblanc wrote a book recording the slugging phenomena and established the website serving for information dissemination and community blog; in BRA1, some obscure individual created the first group but every member holds management privileges; and in IL1,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    USA1/2 were driven by HOV3+ benefits and IL1 by 3+ priority parking offering.

    “the well-known USA1/2 were driven by HOV3 + benefits and IL1 by 3 + priority parking offering.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    USA3 activism was led by O'Brien, CA1 by MAP association of several dozen volunteers, and BRA2 by a group of students, all driven by environmental concerns.

    “USA3 activism was led by O’Brien, CA1—by MAP association of several dozen volunteers, and BRA2—by a group of students, all driven by environmental concerns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    WhatsApp or Facebook arenas superseded the physical arena, resulting in faster and higher exposure.

    “The WhatsApp or Facebook arenas, superseded the physical arena, resulting in faster and higher exposure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    While type2 activists usually adhere to environmental messages, type2 participants are driven mainly by time-optimization concerns and are less involved in the initiative evolution, nor develop a sense of ownership.

    “While its activists usually adhere to environmental messages, participants of type2 are driven mainly by time-optimization concerns and are less involved in the initiative evolution, nor develop a sense of ownership.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    While social interaction is not driving SORS, some groups socialize.

    “while social interaction is not driving SORS, some groups socialize.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    These virtual arenas supported new line formation in USA1 (SlugLines Springfield Official Group 2018) and online norm definition in IL1 [Riders to the rail, 2020].

    “These virtual arenas supported new line formation in USA1 (SlugLines Springfield Official Group 2018), and online norm definition in IL1 [Riders to the rail, 2020].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites SlugLines Springfield Official Group 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Riders to the rail, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In USA1/2, ways of conduct include self-defined etiquette, line functionality, in-car behavior rules, and best practices of parking search and public transport backup.

    “In USA1/2, ways of conduct include self-defined etiquette, line functionality, and in-car behavior rules, as well as best practices of parking search and public transport backup.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The other cases seem to develop organically within an optimization-seeking crowd, without an apparent activists-based structure.

    “The other cases seem to develop organically within optimization seeking crowd, without an apparent activists-based structure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    In USA1, the construction of the Rosslyn line is attributed to a lady who actively replicated other lines by handing out leaflets, setting a timeline, and urging fellow riders to join (LeBlanc 1999); in USA2, during metro service disruptions, Dan Kirshner and his environmentally conscious co-workers shaped the return-home lines after more than a decade of incoming lines.

    “in USA1, the construction of the Rosslyn line is attributed to a lady who actively replicated other lines by handing-out leaflets, setting a timeline, and urging her fellow riders to join (LeBlanc 1999); and in USA2, during metro service disruptions, Dan Kirshner and his environmentally conscious co-workers had shaped the return-home lines after more than a decade of incoming lines.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites LeBlanc 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Type1 (participatory-initiatives) emerges and evolves organically, without long-term agenda, and is driven by self-organized optimization seekers.

    “The first pattern, which we denote as type1, emerges and evolves organically, without long-term agenda, and is driven by self-organized optimization seekers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    IL1/2 allow only functional SORS or transportation-oriented discourse (e.g., rail status, traffic status), while BRA1 group norms allow for university life, personal safety, and local know-how.

    “While IL1/2 allow only functional SORS or transportation-oriented discourse (e.g., rail status, traffic status), BRA1 group norms allow for university life (e.g., electricity outage status), personal safety (e.g., a lecturer was shot), and local know-how (e.g., where to fix an iPhone).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Group-solidarity exchange is shown in the incentive-less IL2/CA1 rides, the return home rides of IL1, and the 'merci lines' of USA1.

    “group-solidarity exchange is shown in the incentive-less IL2/CA1 rides, the return home rides of IL1, and the “merci lines” of USA1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Hitchhiking vocabulary and terminology are evident in IL1/2 and BRA1 discourse, and the thumb-up symbol is used in CA1 and USA3.

    “the hitchhiking vocabulary and terminology are evident in IL1/2 and BRA1 discourse and the thumb-up symbol used in CA1 and USA3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    While being activist-less, specific individuals acted practically as mediators and played a vital role at certain times.

    “While being activists-less, specific individuals acted practically as mediators and played a vital role at certain times.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    Through the years, this type of low-scale, yet community-wide, activism resulted in meaningful accomplishments (such as the bridge-toll-agreement).

    “Through the years, this type of low-scale, yet community-wide, activism resulted in meaningful accomplishments (such as the bridge-toll-agreement to be discussed later).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    The remote lines of USA2 developed social relationships, and BRA1 students share online life experience and even off-line activities.

    “the remote lines of USA2 developed social relationships, and BRA1 students are known to share online life experience and even off-line activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    CA1 relies solely on small place solidarity, requiring no external incentive.

    “CA1 stands-out as relying solely on small place solidarity, requiring no external incentive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Recent digital platforms allow for easier active participation, making any participant a potential couch activist, sending complaints, signing petitions, running surveys, or opening Facebook groups.

    “the recent digital platforms allow for easier active participation, making any participant a potential couch activist, sending complaints, signing petitions, running surveys, or opening Facebook groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Activists usually form a small, dedicated working group, driven by sustainability vision, and communicate among themselves to define their niche and recruit participants.

    “Activists usually form a small, dedicated working group, driven by sustainability vision, and communicate among themselves to define their niche and recruit participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingnone given

    IL1 offers free return trips.

    “IL1 offers free return trips.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    In BRA2, the app interface dictates participants' workflow and dialog, allowing open discussion only among final ride-partners.

    “In BRA2, the app interface dictates participants’ workflow and dialog, allowing open discussion only among the final ride-partners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    All SORS initiatives currently use some form of technological infrastructure for a variety of services: USA1,2 and CA1 use websites for information dissemination; USA1,2 users' forums allow internal communication and lost-and-found; BRA1 and IL1,2 WhatsApp groups and recent USA1 Facebook groups are used for matchmaking, location negotiation, information dissemination, and extra value provision;BRA

    “all SORS initiatives currently use some form of technological infrastructure for a variety of services, as follows: USA1,2 and CA1 use websites for information dissemination (e.g., pickup locations); USA1,2 users’ forums allow internal communication, as well as lost and found sections; BRA1 and IL1,2 WhatsApp groups and the recent USA1 Facebook groups are used for matchmaking, location negotiation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    The more common incentives are third-party provided, as users abstain from monetary friction and the associated disturbance of in-car power-balance.

    “The more common ones are third-party provided, as users abstain from monetary friction and the associated disturbance of in-car power-balance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    From that point, the initiative may return to stability or collapse and terminate, as typical to many RS initiatives.

    “From that point, the initiative may return to stability or collapse and terminate, as typical to many RS initiatives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Type2 (activist-based) is organized by an upfront group of activists, and follows their guiding vision and well-defined structure and norms.

    “The second type, denoted as type2, is organized by an upfront group of activists, and follows their guiding vision and well-defined structure and norms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    In USA3, recording license plate pre-embarkment was recommended, though abandoned soon.

    “in USA3, recording license plate pre-embarkment was recommended, though abandoned soon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingreasoning

    The process of recruitment alters the state of the Initiative from take-off into breakthrough.

    “the process of recruitment alters the state of the Initiative from take-off into breakthrough.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingreasoning

    It also led to an elevated sense of ownership, shared among all participants.

    “It also led to an elevated sense of ownership, shared among all participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    The regime needs to be in a strained state (e.g., increased congestion) for successful SORS to emerge.

    “the regime needs to be in strained state (e.g., increased congestion) for successful SORS to emerge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    BRA1 and BRA2 younger users are motivated by common concerns and sometimes by expense sharing, and their emergence is associated with technology availability.

    “BRA1 and BRA2 younger users are motivated by common concerns and sometimes by expense sharing, and their emergence is associated with technology availability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Sudden changes create instantaneous mass-concentration of solution seekers with higher social cohesion typical of crisis.

    “Unlike gradual adjustments, sudden changes create instantaneous mass-concentration of solution seekers, accompanied by higher social cohesion, typical to time of crisis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In BRA2, even repeated recruitment campaigns failed to regain lost momentum, and users reverted to BRA1.

    “In this case, even repeated recruitment campaigns failed to regain the lost momentum, and users reverted to their functioning BRA1 solution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The comparative analysis revealed several main recurring patterns of significant similarity that allow SORS emergence and provide compensation mechanisms.

    “The comparative analysis of the evolution processes of different SORS cases revealed several main recurring patterns of significant similarity that allow SORS emergence, as well as provide the abovementioned compensation mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    These type2 attempts tend to fail, as only environmentally-committed participants join and critical mass is unachievable.

    “These attempts tend to fail (e.g., USA3 or the Haliburton initiative), as only environmentally-committed participants join, and critical mass is unachievable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Digital platforms are more accommodating: groups of 257 participants show sustainability.

    “Digital platforms seem to be more accommodating, as groups of 257 participants (the maximum number of WhatsApp group members) show sustainability (BRA1, IL2)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Type2 initiatives usually target existing communities, recruiting through events.

    “Type2 initiatives usually target existing communities, recruiting through events, such as publicity campaign, during earth-day in USA3 or green campaign in BRA2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Even the successful IL1 was not replicated by similar local councils, and the single attempt to create a separate group for a specific neighborhood failed.

    “(3) even the successful IL1 was not replicated by similar local councils, and the single attempt to create a separate group for a specific neighborhood failed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Type1 initiatives directly respond to these preconditions, while type2 activists may attempt emergence with partial or no supporting conditions.

    “While type1 initiatives directly respond to these preconditions, type2 activists may attempt emergence with partial or no supporting conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    In IL1, the 2017 rail closure undermined the group's goal; the group adapted its offering to long-distance trips with shared expenses implied, and returned to normal with vigor once service was reestablished.

    “Similarly, in IL1, the 2017 rail closure for renovations undermined the group’s goal. The group responded by adapting its offering to long-distance trips, with shared expenses implied, returning to normal course with vigor once service was reestablished [Riders to the rail 2020].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Riders to the rail 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Diffusion was revealed in BRA1 multiple groups, BRA2 as BRA1 direct offspring, CA1 diffused to neighboring islands, IL1 diffused to a local general-purpose RS group, and IL2 diffused from the canceled shuttle service.

    “Similar diffusion was revealed in the following initiatives: BRA1 multiple groups, also in Telegram and Facebook, which can be considered as sister initiatives, serving the students’ communities of different neighborhoods of the city; BRA2, which is BRA1 direct offspring, inheriting both crowd and practices; CA1, which diffused its practices to multiple neighboring islands, such as the Bowen Lift”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bowen LIFT, n.d.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    Using the conceptual Framework to systematically analyze eight diverse case studies allows portraying SORS as a repeated phenomenon with recurring patterns.

    “Using the conceptual Framework to systematically analyze eight diverse case studies allows us to portray SORS as a repeated phenomenon, where recuring patterns emerge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Repeated collaboration results in users developing a sense of belonging, readiness to defend their initiative, and altruistic behavior toward fellow users.

    “Repeated collaboration results in users developing a sense of belonging, becoming ready to defend their initiative (e.g., protest potential cancelation of parking in IL1), or behaving altruistically towards fellow users (e.g., USA1 merci lines).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    In USA2, the 2010 bridge toll disrupted non-monetary exchange and led to new norms where riders were advised to contribute one dollar towards the toll, becoming the de-facto standard, though a 10% participation reduction was later observed.

    “The debate led to the formation of new norms, where riders were advised to contribute one dollar towards the toll, becoming the de-facto standard (though 10% participation reduction was later observed).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kirchner, n.d.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Perception of efficacy is promoted by following others in action and potentially asking for guidance.

    “Perception of efficacy is found to be promoted by following others in action in the physical or virtual space, and potentially asking for guidance (e.g., new recruits of BRA1 in [Students of UFRJ 2019]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Students of UFRJ 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    In USA1, the 2008 economic crisis and higher gas prices created unmet demand, leading to norms adaptation that allowed an extra passenger over the 3+ required for HOV when the waiting line became too long.

    “In the case of USA1, for instance, economy crisis and higher gas prices of 2008 created unmet demand, resulting in norms adaptation, which allowed an extra passenger, over the 3 + required for HOV, once the waiting line became too long (Oliphant 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oliphant 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Gradual changes only cause minor drive-alone habits' adaptation, whereas sudden semi-crisis events promote SORS best.

    “Additionally, it was observed that gradual changes only cause minor drive-alone habits’ adaptation, whereas sudden semi-crisis events (e.g., PT disruptions, rising gas prices, construction works) promote SORS best – driving road users to search for alternative solutions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The patterns include social dynamics and types of supporting organizations, SORS enabling preconditions, line structure, technology role, diffusion vectors, and contextual anchoring.

    “These patterns, which are further discussed in the following sub-sections, include social dynamics and types of supporting organizations, SORS enabling preconditions, “line” structure, technology role, diffusion vectors, and contextual anchoring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    There is a fine line between nudging and spamming; spamming might cause participants to leave.

    “However, there is a fine line between nudging and spamming, as the latter might cause participants to leave.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In IL1, temporary defection was observed when preferential parking became dysfunctional after the enforcing guard was reassigned; the removal of the policy tool was interpreted as initiative closure, regardless of growing benefits.

    “For example, temporary defection was observed in IL1 when the preferential parking had become dysfunctional after the enforcing guard was reassigned to other duties. This removal of policy tool was interpreted as initiative closure, regardless of its growing benefits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Type2 activists are internally driven and create their own collaboration spaces, while type1 initiatives need a common arena where large crowds can meet.

    “While type2 activists are internally driven and create their own collaboration spaces, type1 initiatives need a common arena, where large crowds can meet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Being type2, BRA2 did not develop further, and its SOC was unable to compensate for app malfunctioning which introduced low QoS.

    “However, being of type2, BRA2 did not develop further, and its SOC was unable to compensate for app malfunctioning which introduced low QoS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    With repeated collaboration, some cases, specifically type1, show emerging SOC, achieving higher levels of community engagement.

    “With repeated collaboration, some cases, specifically of type1, show emerging SOC—achieving higher levels of community engagement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    As of early summer 2021, some revival of SORS had been shown, with CA1 almost back to normal and USA1 Facebook message boards indicating willingness to share again as traffic and parking returned to normal.

    “However, as of early summer of 2021, some revival of SORS had been shown—for example, CA1 reports almost back to normal, providing participants use face masks, and USA1 message boards in Facebook indicate people are willing to start sharing again, as traffic/parking situation is back to normal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The study demonstrated the descriptive power of the Framework and its value for systematic comparison of different cases, exposing context and temporal dependencies previously hidden.

    “Our study demonstrated the descriptive power of the Framework and its value for systematic comparison of different cases, exposing context and temporal dependencies that were previously hidden.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The post-pandemic challenge was observed to halt sharing but affect revival of cases differently.

    “The unprecedented challenge posed by the post pandemic era, was revealed in our continuous observations to halt sharing, but affect revival of cases differently.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The given reasoning stated security-supporting registration and reputation-ranking processes as complex.

    “The given reasoning stated security-supporting registration and reputation-ranking processes as “complex”.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Both types of SORS and all active cases are facilitated to some degree by technology advances.

    “Both types of SORS and all active cases are facilitated to some degree by technology advances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Technology supports multiple goals such as information dissemination, matchmaking, and serving as an arena for self-organization, recruitment, norms building, reorganization, extra-value exchange, nudges, and messages of community-at-work.

    “Technology had been shown here to support multiple goals such as information dissemination and matchmaking, but also to serve as the arena where self-organization can occur. This includes recruitment, norms building, and reorganization, as well as extra-value exchange, nudges, and messages of community-at-work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    USA2 North Berkeley line and BRA1 reside in dense urban structures and serve short travel distances.

    “Thus, for example, USA2 North Berkeley line and BRA1 reside in dense urban structures and serve short travel distances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Direct peer-to-peer monetary incentives in the form of expense-sharing are less effective for commuting-range ridesharing, activating mainly younger and needy crowds.

    “Our exploration indicates that direct P2P monetary incentives in the form of expense-sharing, which have been shown elsewhere to positively influence long-distance travelling (e.g., Finger et al. 2017), are less effective for commuting range, activating mainly younger and needy crowds (e.g., BRA1/2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Finger et al. 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Commercial ridesharing services are not successful as expected, and SORS cases provide limited diffusion.

    “However, RS commercial services are not successful as expected, and SORS cases are shown to provide limited diffusion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The multi-level framework enables examination of how context influences SORS emergence and evolution.

    “The multi-level analysis shifts the focus of exploration from the user-centric approach of what motivates participants to rideshare, to an initiative evolving within its surroundings. Therefore, it enables the examination of how the context influences emergence and evolution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study allows assessing the comprehensiveness of the conceptual framework and validating its usefulness.

    “It also allows assessing the comprehensiveness of the conceptual framework and validating its usefulness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A successful SORS is a pattern of adequate adaptation to place, culture, and social practices.

    “Shoshany-Tavory et al. (2020) postulated that a successful SORS represents a pattern of adequate contextual adaptations to place- culture- and social practices, from which valuable lessons can be learned to stimulate and increase RS uptake.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shoshany-Tavory et al. 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The qualitative multiple-case methodology allows in-depth understanding of why, how, and where questions that other methods find hard to decipher.

    “Such methodology allows in-depth understanding of why, how, and where questions (Yin 2009) that are hard to decipher by other methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yin 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In the late 1980s, BART experienced reduced service demand due to USA2 emergence, resulting in attempts to discourage the practice (Beroldo 1990).

    “in late 80 s, BART (local metro) experienced reduced service demand due to USA2 emergence, resulting in attempts to discourage the practice (Beroldo 1990).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beroldo 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    The interviews served both to validate the results and to provide better contextual understanding of hidden processes such as activists' goals.

    “The interviews provided both validation of the results and better contextual understanding of hidden processes (e.g., goals driving the activists).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The authors' previously proposed conceptual framework allows systematic examination of SORS cases.

    “Identifying these gaps as knowledge barriers to capitalize SORS learning opportunities, the authors have suggested in a previous paper a conceptual framework for systematic examination of SORS cases (Shoshany-Tavory et al. 2020).”
    • Also stated in: § A framework for SORS exploration · plain
      “Such approach is provided by a conceptual framework for SORS exploration (i.e., the “Framework”), recently developed by the authors (Shoshany-Tavory et al. 2020), using existing RS/SORS literature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shoshany-Tavory et al. 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Authorities' concerns may include lack of hard evidence of SORS/RS's impact and policy tools' performance.

    “Authorities’ concerns may also include lack of hard evidence of SORS/RS’s impact and policy tools’ performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Electronic footprints allow retrospective data collection and ex-post analysis because they remain until intentionally omitted.

    “Furthermore, as the electronic footprints remain until intentionally omitted, they also allow retrospective data collection and ex-post analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Traditional success measures like counting daily rides are largely unsuitable for technology-based SORS because rides happen in multiple places or are arranged privately, and users' alternative transport mode can only be inferred indirectly.

    “traditional measures of success (e.g., counting daily rides) are mostly inapplicable, specifically in technology-based SORS, as actual rides occur in multiple locations or arranged by private messages, and users’ alternative modality can only be indirectly inferred.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Experts view ridesharing as an easy and efficient way to transport commuters, requiring modest infrastructure investments, using unharnessed resources, and demanding little government involvement (Burris et al. 2012), while different authorities have traditionally voiced conflicted attitudes towards SORS (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2012).

    “Whereas experts view RS as an easy and efficient way to transport commuters, requiring modest infrastructure investments, using unharnessed resource, and demanding little government involvement (Burris et al. 2012), different authorities had traditionally voiced conflicted attitudes towards SORS (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Burris et al. 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Knowledge about the key elements and mechanisms behind successful SORS is incomplete, which limits efforts to use its diffusion and scaling potential.

    “Still, knowledge regarding the key elements and mechanisms behind successful SORS is partial, hindering the ability to effectively leverage SORS diffusion and scaling potential.”
    • Also stated in: § Literature review · plain
      “However, despite being a seemingly repeated phenomenon, the sporadic and partial body of knowledge on SORS is hindering our ability to effectively leverage SORS diffusion or scaling potential.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Successful initiatives can provide learning opportunities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Car-use competencies allow for trip planning and parking searching.

    “As car-dependent regimes, car-use competencies allow for trip planning and parking searching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The eight selected SORS cases represent diverse cultures, contexts, and operation periods.

    “To allow generalization, the selected cases represent diverse cultures, contexts, and operation periods.”
    • Also stated in: § Case-based analysis · plain
      “As Shoshany-Tavory et al. (2020) predict cultural, geographic, temporal, and technological variations of SORS initiatives, eight different cases were selected (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    SORS formulation and evolution processes follow repeated patterns.

    “According to Shoshany-Tavory et al. (2020), SORS formulation and evolution processes follow repeated patterns, hence their systematic exploration holds learning opportunities for policy improvements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shoshany-Tavory et al. 2020 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    O'Brien and Dunning (2014) found generation-specific responses to hitchhiking in USA3: baby boomers fondly recalled hitchhiking in their youth, while generation Xers expressed wariness.

    “In USA3, O’Brien and Dunning (2014) found generation specific responses: while baby boomers fondly recalled hitchhiking in their youth, generation Xers, growing at the height of USA anti-hitchhiking campaigns, expressed wariness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O’Brien and Dunning (2014) source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Digital footprint sources provide data on otherwise-hidden social processes and are unintrusive, more reliable, and retrospectively accessible.

    “These sources were preferred over the more customary survey methodology (e.g., Shaheen et al. 2016; Rafiq and Mitra 2020; Barbieri et al. 2021), as they provide data on otherwise-hidden social processes while being unintrusive, more reliable, and retrospectively accessible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study's structured analysis allows identification of similar traits and evolution processes, and discovery of recurring patterns linked to initiatives' success and contextual anchoring.

    “The structured analysis allows identification of similar traits and evolution processes, as well as discovery of recurring patterns associated with the initiatives’ success and their contextual anchoring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Some authorities have advocated ridesharing through policy tools, while others have seen high-volume SORS initiatives as undermining their traditional responsibility as transport regulators, raising concerns of disruptions and disorder.

    “While some have advocated RS through the policy tools explored in our literature review, others have seen high volume SORS initiatives as undermining their traditional responsibility as transport regulators, raising concerns of disruptions and disorder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Except for the Lawrence case, all selected cases persisted for more than a year and were active until the Covid-19 pandemic.

    “To avoid cluttering by less founded results, except for the Lawrence case, all selected cases persisted for more than a year and were active until the Covid-19 pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While organic emergence of activist-less initiatives occurs given the right conditions, diffusion to other locations or friction with authorities may prove problematic, requiring some level of activism from its mediators.

    “While organic emergence of activist-less initiatives occurs given the right conditions, diffusion to other locations or friction with authorities may prove problematic, requiring some level of activism from its mediators.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    OPM offers appropriate extending semantics in the form of processes and objects' states, where transition is achieved through processes that lead to state change.

    “OPM offers the appropriate extending semantics in the form processes and objects’ states, where transition is achieved through processes which lead to state change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Leblanc of USA1 claims at least 30 daily drivers are needed for several weeks to jump-start a new line.

    “To jump-start a new line, Leblanc of USA1 [2018] claims at least 30 daily drivers are needed, for several weeks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leblanc of USA1 [2018]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    State-based analysis is envisioned to provide better reflection on the current situation of each component while considering alternative state transitions.

    “State-based analysis is envisioned to provide better reflection on the current situation of each component while considering alternative state transitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    These optimized settings are the work of activists, who are a major component of grassroots innovation to which SORS may belong (Seyfang and Smith 2007).

    “These optimized settings are the work of activists, who are a major component of grassroot innovation to which SORS may belong (Seyfang and Smith 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Seyfang and Smith 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The generic components' architecture (Fig. 2) lacks the ability to capture dynamic change processes.

    “the generic components’ architecture (Fig. 2) serves as a powerful tool for describing and aligning SORS initiatives, it lacks the ability to capture dynamic change processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The absence of safety references in other cases may be attributed to a sense of seclusion achieved by place attachment (CA1, IL1/2, BRA1), or the sense of security provided by digital platforms (identifiable cellular number in IL1/2, BRA1, or SSO in BRA2).

    “This may be attributed to a sense of seclusion achieved by place attachment (CA1, IL1/2, BRA1), or the sense of security provided by the digital platforms, in the form of an identifiable cellular number (IL1/2, BRA1) or the SSO of BRA2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Lengthy and unoptimized take-off dialog establishes an initial sense of community and defines boundaries between collaborators and others.

    “Take-off lengthy and unoptimized dialog serves to establish an initial sense of community, defining the boundaries of “us” (the collaborators) versus “them” (all the others, including solution providers).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Shorter trips are less expensive, so expense-sharing schemes' value is negligible compared to overall direct and indirect costs.

    “Second, shorter trips are less expensive, thus expense-sharing schemes value, which is the prime motivator of commercial-app use, is negligible compared to the overall direct and indirect costs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The comparative classification complements existing user-centric case studies and allows a wider perspective on SORS.

    “While the details may vary, the comparative classification, using the different analysis units, complements the existing user-centric case studies (e.g., Burris et al. 2012; Shaheen et al. 2016) and allow us to gain wider perspective on SORS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Burris et al. 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Shaheen et al. 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To tip the transaction-costs equation for short commuting distance and mature crowds, third-party incentives are needed where monetary incentives show less effectiveness.

    “To tip the transaction-costs equation for the short commuting distance and the more mature crowds, third-party incentives are needed where monetary incentives show less effectiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By highlighting recurring success contributors and locational interpretations, the comparative analysis suggests that SORS potential can be estimated in advance, externally influenced, and replicated beyond its current localized context.

    “By highlighting both the recurring success contributors and the different locational interpretations, through our comparative analysis we suggest that SORS potential can be estimated in advance, externally influenced, and replicated beyond its current localized context.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    SORS/RS promotion policies may be offered to improve solutions to mid-short distance commuting in variable conditions and for difficult-to-attract crowds.

    “Thus, SORS/RS promotion policies may be offered to improve solutions to mid-short distance commuting in variable conditions, and for difficult to attract crowds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Repeated social-like sharing within well-defined enclaves (line structure) results in defining boundaries of us versus them, using common symbols and trust among peers to fulfill needs, which are essential signs of SOC.

    “We claim that repeated, social-like sharing within well-defined enclaves (i.e., line structure), results in defining the boundaries of “us” versus “them”, using common symbols and trust among peers to fulfill their needs—which are the essential signs of SOC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such policies can complement the sustainable-transportation toolbox and increase RS uptake in areas that meet SORS-based criteria.

    “Such policies can complement the sustainable-transportation toolbox and consequently increase RS uptake in areas that meet SORS-based criteria.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    USA1 may be seen as the product of congestion and oil prices while subverting official actors' intentions in applying HOV+3 rules.

    “For example, USA1 may be seen as the product of congestion and oil prices (i.e., friction) while subverting the official actors’ intentions in applying HOV + 3 rules (Mote and Whitestone 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mote and Whitestone 2011 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Type1 examples seem to rely on the noted sense of community among members and the existence of an arena where reorganization can occur.

    “These type1 examples seem to rely on the noted sense of community among its members, as well as the existence of an arena where reorganization can occur.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These conditions create an instantaneous critical mass of potential collaborators, overcoming stranger-danger and QoS barriers.

    “These conditions create an instantaneous critical mass of potential collaborators, overcoming the stranger-danger and the QoS barriers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This reduces the number of potential collaborators and the initiative QoS through lack of critical mass and reduces service effectiveness for this range.

    “This in turn reduces the number of potential collaborators and the initiative QoS through lack of critical mass and reduces the service effectiveness for this range.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    These incentives retain the driver's status as ride-owner and eliminate in-car stress associated with monetary awkwardness.

    “Moreover, they retain the driver’s status as ride-owner and eliminate in-car stress associated with monetary awkwardness (Deakin et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Deakin et al. 2010 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The regime interacts with the SORS-niche unknowingly, as existing friction stimulates SORS and offerings of external actors provide incentives and solutions.

    “Unknowingly, the regime interacts with the SORS-niche, as the existing friction stimulate SORS, and offerings of external actors provide incentives and solutions to tap into.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    The regime lends its supportive infrastructure and incentive opportunities.

    “The regime also lends its supportive infrastructure and incentive opportunities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The structure and perceptions of SORS initiatives effectively compensate these gaps by lowering transaction costs and mitigating periods of low QoS.

    “Our findings suggest that both the structure and perceptions of SORS initiatives serve to effectively compensate these gaps by lowering transaction-costs to an agreeable level and mitigating periods of low QoS.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The examination of the multi-level niche-regime-landscape structure and evolution processes provides better understanding of the phenomenon within its context than previous studies.

    “The examination of the multi-level niche-regime-landscape structure and evolution processes provides better understanding of the phenomenon within its context than previous studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The niche-level may comprise both participatory style (type1) and activists-driven (type2) SORS, operating within regime and landscape levels that encompass existing communities from which SOC and participation may be drawn and practices borrowed.

    “As to organizational dynamics, the niche-level may comprise both types of SORS: the participatory style (type1) and the activists-driven (type2). They operate within the regime and landscape level which encompass existing communities, from which SOC and participation may be drawn and practices borrowed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Drivers of short-mid distance trips are mainly driven by time-saving motivations and have lower flexibility, making detours costly and less acceptable.

    “Consequently, drivers of short-mid distance trips are mainly driven by time saving motivations and their flexibility is lowered compared to longer trips, making detours costly and less acceptable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Commercial apps lack the same structure and benefits, and their standard interface provides no similar compensations, explaining their limited success at those distances.

    “Commercial apps lack the same structure and benefits, and the standard interface provides no similar compensations, thus their limited success in those distances is understandable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To mitigate the persistent-case bias, the authors highlight several failed replications in the vicinity of the explored cases.

    “To mitigate this concern, we highlight several failed replications in the vicinity of the explored cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The failed diffusion of IL1 to similar local councils can be attributed to a missing arena for self-organization and insufficient critical mass.

    “(3) the failed diffusion of IL1 to similar local councils, can be attributed to missing arena for self-organization and insufficient critical mass.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Although participants seldom report social motivation as driving recruitment, observations associate the process with existing and emerging SOC.

    “Therefore, though participants seldom report social motivation as driving their recruitment, our observations associate the process with existing and emerging SOC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Participants may perceive their peers as safe because they belong to the same limited-purpose group, were recruited in the same way, and have the arena as a dispute-handling platform, supported by low-entry technology choice.

    “They may perceive their peers as safe since they belong to the same limited-purpose group, were recruited in the same way, and have the arena as a dispute-handling (or shaming) platform – all supported by their low-entry technology choice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Monitoring ridesharing activity allows official actors to ensure its sustainability, for example by removing local hurdles to threatened lines.

    “Through monitoring the RS activity, official actors can ensure its sustainability—for example by removing local hurdles to specific threatened lines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    SORS and ridesharing can be assisted by technology to elevate ride-matching odds while maintaining low transaction costs.

    “SORS and RS can be assisted by technology for elevating ride-matching odds, while maintaining low transaction-costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Multiple fixed-route ridesharing lines can exchange information and integrate with other sustainable travelling modes.

    “These multiple fixed-route RS lines can exchange information and integrate with other sustainable travelling modes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An active role by authorities reduces the perception of ridesharing as deviant while mitigating official actors' liability concerns.

    “Such an active role reduces RS deviancy perception while mitigating official actors’ liability concerns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some SORS cases have preexisting high SOC, but in general prior SOC level is defined by cultural traits, traveled distance, urban density, age, and economic state.

    “Some SORS cases own preexisting high SOC (e.g., small and rural CA1), but in general prior SOC level is found to be defined by cultural traits, traveled distance, urban density, age, and economic state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Selection of persistent cases, except USA3, where data was available may introduce bias and limit ability to reflect on failed attempts.

    “Similarly, bias may be introduced through our selection of persistent cases (except for USA3), where data was available, limiting our ability to reflect on failed attempts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Value-for-money decisions can be made in advance and intervention test-trials may have better success rates.

    “Specifically, value-for-money decisions can be made in advance and intervention test-trials may have better success rates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Encouraging ridesharing in privately owned autonomous vehicles for older, suburban, and rural user groups may require interventions and SORS-like stimulations similar to the presented work.

    “encouraging ridesharing in privately owned AVs, for these users’ groups, may require interventions and SORS-like stimulations similar to our presented work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The determinants cultural traits, traveled distance, urban density, age, and economic state can be estimated in advance to predict users-groups' willingness to participate, engage in altruist behavior, and provide transportation and social value to their peers.

    “Similarly, the determinants cultural traits, traveled distance, urban density, age, and economic state can be estimated in advance to predict users-groups’ willingness to participate, engage in altruist behavior, and provide transportation and social value to their peers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Local culture and travel distance dictate what is an acceptable exchange and how far familiarity can go in reducing stress-related anxieties.

    “Third, the local culture (specific to country and users’ group) and travel distance dictate what is an acceptable exchange and how far can familiarity go in reducing stress-related anxieties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Data availability dictated different source types for each case, so the information base might be misrepresenting or biased.

    “Data availability also dictates different source types for each case. Consequently, the information base might be misrepresenting or biased.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The integrated approach embraces self-organization and offers low-cost adaptations of policies.

    “The integrated approach embraces self-organization and offers a set of low-cost adaptations of policies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Digital platforms present an integration opportunity for SORS and commercial ridesharing into Mobility-as-a-Service.

    “Finally, digital platforms present an integration opportunity of SORS and commercial RS into Mobility-as-a-Service.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Removing policy tools such as changing HOV to toll lanes might lead to loss of value, signal lack of appreciation, hinder communal spirit, and consequently result in initiative termination.

    “However, care should be exercised when removing policy tools, such as changing HOV to toll lanes, which might lead to loss of value, signal lack of appreciation of the initiative, and hinder the communal spirit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Successful diffusion of SORS needs to incorporate knowledge, meaning, specific context understanding, and replicate SORS evolution processes.

    “Therefore, successful diffusion needs to incorporate not only knowledge, meaning, and specific context understanding, but also replicate SORS evolution processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The addition of the regime/landscape view allows understanding of contextual anchoring, recurring patterns, and differentiating attributes.

    “The addition of the regime/landscape view in our holistic multi-level approach, allows understanding of the contextual anchoring, the recurring patterns, and the differentiating attributes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because no one needs to wait out and transactions are evaluated in advance, the value of technology-assisted ride matching can be immediately achieved.

    “As no one needs to wait-out, and transaction is evaluated in advance, this value can be immediately achieved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The line structure establishes a large-enough users' base while retaining localized familiarity.

    “While the such structure establishes a large-enough users’ base, it still retains localized familiarity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Optimization of the existing ridesharing toolbox may support SORS and ridesharing in general.

    “This optimization of the existing RS toolbox may support SORS, but also RS in general.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Effective monitoring allows tailoring to local context and deriving insights for more effective replications.

    “Effective monitoring further allows tailoring to the local context and deriving insights leading to more effective replications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Technology innovations created new alternatives for sharing, simplifying the process compared to the pre-accessible internet age.

    “These innovations have created new alternatives for sharing, for both communal and utilitarian purposes, simplifying the process compared to pre-accessible internet age (Belk 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Belk 2014 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Indirect and comfort-based incentives reduce monetary eversion and potential in-car strains and improve resource utilization.

    “These incentives reduce monetary eversion (Deakin et al. 2010) and potential in-car strains (Zmud and Rojo 2013), and improve the utilization of resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Deakin et al. 2010 source
    • cites Zmud and Rojo 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    BRA2's initial SOC resembles BRA1's SOC, which explains its initial high recruitment.

    “For example, BRA2’s initial SOC resembles BRA1’s SOC, which explains its initial high recruitment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Replication of SORS may occur naturally within similar regime, landscape and triggering conditions, enabling the same user base to join a new line with similar norms.

    “First, replication may naturally occur, within similar regime, landscape and triggering conditions, empowering the same users’ base to join a new line with similar norms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Existing and emerging SOC compensate for periods of low QoS and support initiatives' resiliency, increasing the chances of SORS prevalence over time.

    “Existing and emerging SOC compensate for periods of low QoS, and support initiatives resiliency thus increasing the chances of SORS prevalence over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Applying carrots in parallel to upcoming sticks may improve the uptake of ridesharing.

    “Applying those so called “carrots” in parallel to upcoming “sticks” may improve the uptake of RS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Emergence is associated with accessibility to a concentration of participants, providing better QoS and improved matchmaking odds.

    “Emergence is also associated with accessibility to a concentration of participants is provided (either their origins or accessible chokepoints), thus providing better QoS and consequently improved matchmaking odds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Technology assistance provides more grace period for digital initiatives to stabilize.

    “Thus, more grace period is provided for the digital initiatives to stabilize.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Strangers become part of a community and repeated rides are more likely, reducing overall ridesharing stress and allowing exchange of social goods.

    “Thus, strangers become part of a community and repeated rides are more likely to occur, reducing the overall ridesharing related stress and allowing the exchange of social goods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    BRA1 rises within younger and needy crowds, sharing a culture of low physical distancing and preexisting SOC of a homogeneous student community, making it easier to create and follow faster recruitment without official intervention.

    “Yet, BRA1 rises within younger and needy crowds, sharing culture of low physical distancing and preexisting SOC of homogeneous student community, therefore easier to create and follow faster recruitment, without any official intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Using SOC level as an explaining attribute, students' communities will always be ready to participate, while mature crowds will need external triggers and a build-up process to be activated.

    “Using SOC level as one of the explaining attributes we can predict that students’ communities will always be ready to participate, while mature crowds will need external triggers and build-up process to be activated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To increase study validity, the authors used multiple cases, qualitative exploration, and combined digital footprints, personal interviews, and earlier explorations.

    “To increase study’s validity, we opted for multiple cases, using qualitative exploration, and combining information extracted from digital footprints, personal interviews, and earlier explorations of some of the selected cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In a network-level service vision, ridesharing lines can be linked into multi-hop routes similar to public transit, trading trust across different lines' groups.

    “In this vision, network-level service may be envisioned, where RS “lines” can be linked into multi-hop routes, similarly to the PT system, trading trust across the different lines’ groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Using the policy and technology recommendations may encourage SORS and its diffusion and ease hurdles faced by commercial ridesharing services.

    “We assert that using the policy and technology recommendations offered in Sect. 5.4 may not only encourage SORS and its diffusion, but also ease the hurdles faced by commercial RS services.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The authors combined existing impact assessments with meta-analysis of electronic footprints; users' perceptions from content analysis and interviews were combined with recruitment/defection ratio and online traffic rate.

    “Thus, we combined existing impact assessments (e.g., surveys performed by other scholars) with meta-analysis of electronic footprints. Specifically, users’ perceptions, elicited through content analysis and interviews, were combined with estimates of recruitment/defection ratio and online traffic rate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Assessing participants' socio-demographic parameters is challenging because many platforms do not support user profiles; the authors relied on platform-available profiles, interviewee accounts, and previous studies.

    “Assessing the participants socio-demographic parameters is also challenging, since many cases use platforms that do not support users’ profiles. Here again we had to rely on platform-available profiles, interviewees accounts, and previous studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductnone given

    For additional information on previously studied cases, only key stakeholders were interviewed and data was appended with documented interviews and surveys.

    “Specifically, for additional information on previously studied cases, we interviewed only key stakeholders (activists or mediators) and appended our data with documented interviews and surveys.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although research deficiencies may limit generality, the emerging patterns were consistently repeated, so the authors believe generalization was achieved.

    “While these research deficiencies may limit the generality of our findings, the emerging patterns were consistently repeated. Therefore, we believe generalization was achieved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Interviews were supplementary; only 12 interviews were performed until saturation was reached.

    “The interviews’ role was supplementary, hence we performed only a small number (12) of interviews, until saturation was reached.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Counting actual rides is almost impossible, and users' alternative modality can only be indirectly inferred.

    “Counting the actual rides is almost impossible, and users’ alternative modality can only be indirectly inferred.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
175 of 175
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Successful initiatives can provide learning opportunities.

    “Following the premise that successful initiatives may provide learning opportunities, this study aims at narrowing this knowledge gap by performing a comparative cross-cultural systematic study of eight diverse SORS cases.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Short- and mid-range trips make up the vast majority of commuting trips.

    “As short- mid-range trips correspond to the vast majority of commuting trips, the low effectiveness of RS policies and commercial offerings, restrict their potential system-wide impact in reducing SOV externalities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The selected SORS cases are representative of SORS initiatives in different contexts, allowing generalization of the cross-case patterns.

    “we conducted cross comparison of the cases via the Framework constructs to reveal repeated patterns and variations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The alternative success indicators used (case persistence, users' positive perceptions, recruitment vs defection rates, and matchmaking traffic estimates) are valid measures of SORS success.

    “As success indicators, we combined case persistence over time, users’ positive perceptions (through thematic exploration), positive recruitment vs defection rates (produced by statistical analysis) and estimates of matchmaking traffic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The digital trace data (WhatsApp messages and Facebook groups) are representative of the groups' communication and interactions.

    “WhatsApp messages since inception, N = 452, n= 10,200”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The eight selected SORS cases are representative enough of the broader phenomenon for the comparative findings to generalize.

    “Using the conceptual Framework to systematically analyze eight diverse case studies allows us to portray SORS as a repeated phenomenon, where recuring patterns emerge.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants' online messages and reported experiences accurately reflect their motivations, recruitment, and participation behavior.

    “The analysis of WhatsApp messages since the inception of IL1 [Riders to the rail, 2020] reveals that learning and setting of norms appear as a gradual process in which matchmaking dialog schemes are trialed by different users, and the fittest schemes survive in a follow-the-lead type of learning.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Facebook has superior searchable properties that allow faster and wider exposure and recruitment, but some crowds avoid it and prefer less spam-infested and more just-in-time platforms such as WhatsApp.

    “For example, while Facebook is superior in its searchable property, allowing faster and wider exposure and recruitment, some crowds are weary of its use, preferring less spam-infested and more just-in-time platforms, such as WhatsApp.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Low-occupancy rate will continue to be a city-wide issue in the long-term future.

    “In the long-term future, low-occupancy rate may continue being a city-wide issue.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technological innovation, including digital tools, plays a growing role in NPOs.

    “Technological innovation, including digital tools, plays a growing role [59].”

    From Sustainable Value Creation in Nonprofit Organizations: Processes, Determinants, and Strategic Dimensions (2026) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Discussion (‘The role of technology’; page unavailable) says technology advances facilitate all active nonprofit self-organized ridesharing cases, and the Results (‘Architecture of SORS’; page unavailable) lists their use of websites, messaging platforms, and apps. The paper supports a growing role for digital tools in those ridesharing initiatives, but does not establish that trend for NPOs generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Transit-backup claim conflicts with the Pender Island case

    Minor

    The paper says successful meeting places have existing public transit as a backup, but its case table describes CA1, the continuing Pender Island initiative, as having no mass transit.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Beroldo, S.: Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transp. q. 44(1), 133–150 (1990)
  2. Beroldo, S.: Casual Carpooling 1998 Update. RIDES for Bay Area Commuters Inc, Oakland (1999)
  3. Oliphant, M. (2008). The native slugs of Northern Virginia: A profile of slugging in the Washington D.C. region. Master's Thesis, Virginia Tech Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, VA.
  4. Rip, R., Kemp, A.: Technological change. In: Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (eds.) Human choices and climate change, pp. 327–399. Battelle Press, Columbus (1998)
  5. Salzman, R.: Rise of the Slug. Thinking Highways. 8(3), 7–12 (2013)
  6. Teixeira, L.: Plataformas digitais de mobilidade urbana: O caso do Caronaê UFRJ. UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro (2018)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shoshany-Tavory, S., Trop, T., & Shiftan, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Venue
Transportation
Published
2022-11-09
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
717-757
ISSN
  • 0049-4488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9435
OpenAlex
W4308748031
Cited by
4
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
ISTRC
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
Keywords
cross-cultural comparison, sustainable transport, conceptual framework, policy recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-29, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-29 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review