The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Creativity and urban governance
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between ‘creativity’ and ‘innovation’, and the forms and practices of ‘governance’ in an urban context. It examines, in particular, the ‘double’ creativity of governance, both in terms of its potential to foster creativity in social and economic dynamics and to creatively transform its own capacities. It argues that there is no simple equation between the characteristics of a ‘creative city’ and a ‘creative’ mode of urban governance. Instead, the article advocates a multi-level approach to the dimensions of urban governance through which to identify qualities of governance activity, which, in specific contexts, have the potential to encourage creativity and innovation. The article first develops three meanings of creativity and outlines the way these are related to governance activity. A three-level approach to the interacting dimensions of governance is then presented, linking episodes, processes and cultures. This approach is then developed into an evaluative framework through which the creative potentialities of emergent properties of governance practices in specific situations can be explored. In conclusion, the article comments on the kinds of governance infrastructures which may have the capacity to release imaginative and innovative activities in city regions, the kinds of interventions which may help to transform such capacity and the imaginative resources and mobilising power which may help successful innovations to spread from experiment to ‘mainstream’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2015) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-150354 · Cited by 493
A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity
González, S., & Healey, P. (2005) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/00420980500279778 · Cited by 357
Self-citationChu, E., Anguelovski, I., & Roberts, D. (2017) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Healey, P.
- Venue
- Policy Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-102
- ISSN
- 0144-2872 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1006
- OpenAlex
- W2153621941
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creativity and urban governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0144287042000262189
- The paper
- Healey, P. (2004). Creativity and urban governance. Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144287042000262189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.