The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning preferences and readiness for online learning
Abstract
Using a sample of 314 Australian university students the Readiness for Online Learning questionnaire was tested for its technical characteristics of reliability and factorability, with results indicating the instrument has promise both for research and for practice. The factor analysis identified a factor associated with self‐management of learning, and one of comfort with e‐learning. These factors are interpreted and discussed within a framework of the broader literature on learning preferences associated with flexible delivery and resource‐based learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Cited by
Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions
Hung, M.-L., Chou, C., Chen, C.-H., & Own, Z.-Y. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004 · Cited by 1,066
Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic
Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101 · Cited by 1,047
Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms
Hao, Y. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032 · Cited by 346
Promoting students' well-being by developing their readiness for the artificial intelligence age
Dai, Y., Chai, C.-S., Lin, P.-Y., Jong, M. S.-Y., Guo, Y., & Qin, J. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12166597 · Cited by 330
Clinton-McHarg, T., Yoong, S. L., Tzelepis, F., Regan, T., Fielding, A., Skelton, E., Kingsland, M., Ooi, J. Y., & Wolfenden, L. (2016) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0512-5 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith *, P. J.
- Venue
- Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-12
- ISSN
- 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5820
- OpenAlex
- W1979369017
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0144341042000294868
- The paper
- Smith *, P. J. (2005). Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000294868
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
