CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the link between early constructor involvement in project decision-making and the efficacy of health and safety risk control

Lingard, Helen, Pirzadeh, Payam, Blismas, Nick, Wakefield, Ron, Kleiner, Brian·2014·Construction Management and Economics
DOI 10.1080/01446193.2014.911931
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The position of the constructor in communication networks, including those before the commencement of construction, is likely related to the quality of work health and safety (WHS) outcomes realized. In order to examine the extent of this relationship, 23 cases were drawn from 10 participating construction projects in Australia and New Zealand. Social network analysis was used to mathematically and graphically model information exchanges in 13 of these cases. For each case, the quality of WHS risk control outcomes was measured. This measurement was based on an established ‘hierarchy of control’ in which risk controls are classified in descending order of effectiveness from the elimination of a hazard (the most effective) to the reliance on personal protective equipment (the least effective). Social network metrics were calculated reflecting: (1) the ratio of actual links among parties in the project network relative to the maximum number of links possible (network density); and (2) the extent to which the constructor communicated with other parties in pre-project planning and design stages (the constructors’ degree centrality). Network metrics were compared for cases in which the risk control scores were higher and lower than average. The results showed a significant difference in constructors’ pre-construction degree centrality for cases with high and low risk control scores. The results provide preliminary evidence as to the potential WHS benefits of ensuring that construct…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01446193.2014.911931

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personal protective equipment (PPE) is rated as the lowest and least effective safety control for any high-risk activity including human-horse interactions.

    “While personal protective equipment (PPE) should be part of human–horse risk management, it is rated as the ‘lowest’ and ‘least’ effective safety control for any ‘high-risk’ activity including human–horse interactions [17,119,120,121].”

    From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [119]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1080/01446193.2012.685486 · DOI
  2. 10.1108/09699980910927877 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/01446193.2010.504214 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.016 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.04.002 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005 · DOI
  7. Brace C., 2009, Inquiry into the underlying causes of construction fatal accidents, Phase 2 Report: Health and safety in the construction industry: Underlying causes of construction fatal accidents – External research
  8. 10.1080/014461900370852 · DOI
  9. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2012, Occupational Injury and Illness Classification Manual, version 2.01
  10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(804) · DOI
  11. 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000161 · DOI
  12. 10.1108/09699980810886847 · DOI
  13. Daniels C, 2005, HSL/2005/36, Health and Safety Laboratory
  14. Donaghy R., 2009, One Death Is Too Many: Inquiry into the Underlying Causes of Construction Fatal Accidents
  15. 10.2307/258557 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1080/01446193.2010.506643 · DOI
  17. Fellows R., 1997, Research Methods for Construction
  18. 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000723 · DOI
  19. Gibb A., 2004, Designing for Safety and Health in Construction, 11
  20. 10.1108/09699980610690729 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/01446190802298413 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.12.002 · DOI
  23. Health and Safety Executive, 2003, Causal Factors in Construction Accidents
  24. 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.01.001 · DOI
  25. 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000188 · DOI
  26. Lingard H., 2013, ‘If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it’: measuring health and safety performance in the construction industry
  27. 10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.017 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00066-5 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.01.004 · DOI
  30. 10.1205/psep.05083 · DOI
  31. Orum A.M., 1991, A Case for the Case Study
  32. 10.1080/0144619042000206533 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/01446190500184196 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/01446193.2011.654127 · DOI
  35. Safe Work Australia, 2012, Construction Industry Factsheet
  36. Safe Work Australia, 2012, Australian Work Health and Safety Strategy 2012–2022
  37. 10.1080/01446191003702468 · DOI
  38. 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2009)25:1(12) · DOI
  39. 10.1080/01446190903450061 · DOI
  40. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:4(337) · DOI
  41. Wasserman S., 1997, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
  42. Winter J.F.C, 2013, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18
  43. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:6(635) · DOI
  44. Yin R.K., 1994, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
  45. 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000645 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lingard, H., Pirzadeh, P., Blismas, N., Wakefield, R., & Kleiner, B.
Venue
Construction Management and Economics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-05-08
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
918-931
ISSN
  • 0144-6193
  • 1466-433X
DOI
10.1080/01446193.2014.911931
Cited by
47
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review