The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identity crisis: user perspectives on multiplicity and control in federated identity management
Open accessAbstract
Federated identity management systems synthesise complex and fragmented user information into a single entity. Literature from the provider's perspective notes this integration extends many benefits to the end user and the privileges provided by digital identity authentication schemes have been well documented from this perspective. Less explored are the perceptions of federation from the user's perspective. This study reports an empirical user study that examines the relationship between identity and technology using contextual interviews, focus groups and cultural probes. It emerges that while current federated systems satisfy user needs by allowing the construction of multiple digital data sets that are moored to a central identifier, they fail to provide the user with control over the capability to act in the ‘hatch’, ‘match’ and ‘dispatch’ phases of the digital identity lifecycle. Ultimately, this reduces the user's trust in providers and results in reluctance to disclose personal details.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lack of adequate data ownership and control over digital identity data by users has a major negative impact on users' privacy rights and access to services.
“Lack of adequate data ownership and control over digital identity data by users, in addition to the absence of adequate digital identity for over a billion individuals worldwide [1], have a major negative impact on users' privacy rights and access to services [2].”
From A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
Section 3.1 (page not supplied) links limited user control over identity data to compromised privacy. Sections 6.2 and 7 report that lack of control discourages disclosure and participation in federated identity systems, but they do not establish a major negative impact on access to services generally or address data ownership as such. The separate claim about over a billion people is attached to [1], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe permissionless and public DLT model may be vulnerable to attacks common in various open DLT architectures.
“On the other hand, the permissionless and public model may be vulnerable to attacks common in various open DLT architectures [2].”
From A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
Section 3.4 discusses identity theft in digital identity management, and section 3.1 discusses control of personal information in federated systems. Neither addresses permissionless or public distributed ledgers or attacks on open DLT architectures. Searches for the claim’s wording and for blockchain, permissionless architectures, and attacks found no relevant passage in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Djamba, Y. K., & Neuman, W. L. (2002) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/3211488 · Cited by 8,853
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Neuman, W. L. (1991) · Cited by 7,055
Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet
Turkle, S. (1997) · Cited by 6,340
Mattley, C. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1999) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2655359 · Cited by 2,412
Gaver, W. W., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999) · interactions · doi:10.1145/291224.291235 · Cited by 2,310
The Oxford English Dictionary and Its Philosophy
Simpson, J. (2013) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-013-0118-7 · Cited by 2,071
Security without identification: transaction systems to make big brother obsolete
Chaum, D. (1985) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/4372.4373 · Cited by 1,666
Martins, J. T., Nunes, M. B., Alajamy, M., & Zhou, L. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2491-7.ch008 · Cited by 1,190
Vetere, F., Gibbs, M., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., & Bunyan, M. (2005) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1054972.1055038 · Cited by 1,048
Self-citationMudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities.
Curtis, P. (1997) · Cited by 440
Identity management and its support of multilateral security
Clauß, S., & Köhntopp, M. (2001) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(01)00217-1 · Cited by 169
The coming battle for customer information.
Hagel, J., & Rayport, J. F. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 154
Cultural formations in text-based virtual realities
Reid, E. (1994) · Cited by 144
Usability and privacy in identity management architectures
Jøsang, A., Zomai, M. A., & Suriadi, S. (2007) · Cited by 133
'The Oxford English dictionary'
Thomas, R. (1904) · Notes and Queries · doi:10.1093/nq/s10-i.13.255e · Cited by 106
Mobile Identity Management: An Enacted View
Roussos, G., Peterson, D., & Patel, U. (2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044287 · Cited by 92
Mudding: Social Phenomena in Text-Based Virtual Realities
(2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315806389-14 · Cited by 92
Community Support and Identity Management
Koch, M. R., & Wörndl, W. (2005) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48019-0_17 · Cited by 60
Clarke, K., Rouncefield, M., Rodden, T. A., et al. (2002) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 56
Knowing me, knowing you: End user perceptions of identity management systems
Satchell, C., Shanks, G., Howard, S., et al. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 27
Self-citationPRIME white paper v2, June 2007
Leenes, R. E., Schallaböck, J., & Hansen, M. E. (2007) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Clarke R., 2001, Authentication: a sufficiently rich model to enable e-business
- Clarke R., 2004, Identity Management
- 2006, Introduction to Higgins
- Gengler B., 2004, The Australian, 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem
Soltani, R., Nguyen, U. T., & An, A. (2021) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1155/2021/8873429 · Cited by 131
“Bitcoin protocol was officially launched on the third of January 2009.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Satchell, C., Shanks, G., Howard, S., & Murphy, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Micro Focus (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Satchell, C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-62
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W2071203427
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.tandfonline.com
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (LP0347459)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- federated identity management, user identity, user control, identity verification, user trust, personal information disclosure, multiple identities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
