The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Persuasiveness of expert systems
Open accessAbstract
Expert system advice is not always evaluated by examining its contents. Users can be persuaded by expert system advice because they have certain beliefs about advice given by a computer. The experiment in this paper shows that subjects (n = 84) thought that, given the same argumentation, expert systems are more objective and rational than human advisers. Furthermore, subjects thought a problem was easier when advice on it was said to be given by an expert system while the advice was shown in production rule style. Such beliefs can influence expert system use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Reported behaviors include both a skepticism or distrust of algorithmic advice (algorithmic aversion)12–14 and more willingness to adhere to algorithmic advice over human advice (algorithmic appreciation)15,16.”
From Do as AI say: susceptibility in deployment of clinical decision-aids (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change
Marquart, F., & Naderer, B. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_20 · Cited by 5,011
Davis, F. D. (1993) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022 · Cited by 4,754
The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 · Cited by 2,913
The measurement of user information satisfaction
Ives, B., Olson, M. H., & Baroudi, J. J. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358413.358430 · Cited by 1,860
Persuasion theory and research
O’Keefe, D. J. (1990) · Cited by 1,555
Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use
Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440 · Cited by 1,540
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [7]7. BODEN, M. 1990, Artificial intelligence and images of man, in R. Ennals and J. Gardin (eds), Interpretation in the Humanities: Perspectives from Artificial Intelligence (Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press), 10-21.
- [17]17. DIJKSTRA, J. J. 1995, The influence of an expert system on the user's view: How to fool a lawyer. New Review of Applied Expert Systems, 1, 123 -138.
- [22]22. HOLLNAGEL, E. 1989, The reliability of expert systems-an inquiry of the background, in E. Hollnagel (ed.), The Reliability of Expert Systems (Sussex: Ellis Horwood), 14 - 32.
- [41]41. ROBEY, D. 1979, User attitude and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 527-538.
- [50]50. WOGNUM, P. M. 1990, Explanation of Automated Reasoning: How and Why?, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Twente.
- [51]51. WORCHEL, S., COOPER, J. and GOETHALS, G. R. 1988, Under- standing Social Psychology (Chicago: Dorsey Press).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–161 of 161
Perceived Trustworthiness of Human vs. AI Instructors in Digital Privacy Education for Older Adults
Aly, H., Byrne, K. A., & Knijnenburg, B. P. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3640544.3645238 · Cited by 8
Source Factors in Recommender System Credibility Evaluation
Yoo, K., Ulrike Gretzel, B., & Zanker, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_20 · Cited by 8
Content Use from Websites: Effects of Governance Mechanisms
Kayhan, V. O., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2013) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2013.11645652 · Cited by 8
Designing Trust in Highly Virtual : A Taxonomy of Levels of Autonomy
Galdón, F., Hall, A., & Wang, S. (2021) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61045-6_14 · Cited by 1
Boob-Engel, K. (2025) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2025.2594620 · Cited by 9
When do people rely on algorithms
Logg, J. M. (2016) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 7
Auditor Automation Usage and Professional SkepticismPreprint
Peters, C. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4309348 · Cited by 8
Journalistic interventions matter: Understanding how Americans perceive fact-checking labels
Jia, C., & Lee, T. (2024) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-138 · Cited by 5
Kaufmann, E., & Chacon, A. (2026) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2026.101462 · Cited by 3
Human Motivation in Competition against Artificial Intelligence: Using One-to-One Games
Yokoi, R., & Nakayachi, K. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2316374 · Cited by 6
A Conceptual Framework for User Trust in AI Biosensors: Integrating Cognition, Context, and Contrast
Prahl, A. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25154766 · Cited by 6
Do People Recover from Algorithm Aversion? An Experimental Study of Algorithm Aversion over Time
Leffrang, D., Bösch, K., & Müller, O. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.491 · Cited by 6
User interaction with legal knowledge-based systems
Dijkstra, J. J. (2000) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 6
Self-citationLee, K., Cho, W., Woo, H., & de Jong, S. B. (2025) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.70009 · Cited by 5
Human vs. Automation: Which One Will You Trust More If You Are About to Lose Money?
Fahim, M., Khan, M. M. H., Jensen, T., & Albayram, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2076772 · Cited by 5
Chakraborty, T., Sharada, V. S., & Sai, S. D. D. (2024) · Advances in marketing, customer relationship management, and e-services book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5668-5.ch002 · Cited by 5
Guo, L., Flathmann, C., Anaraky, R. G., McNeese, N. J., & Knijnenburg, B. P. (2022) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/3511095.3531280 · Cited by 5
How Terminology Affects Users’ Responses to System Failures
Candrian, C., & Scherer, A. (2023) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/00187208231202572 · Cited by 5
Yokoi, R., & Nakayachi, K. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02559-w · Cited by 5
Fogg, B. J. (2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-155860643-2/50008-1 · Cited by 5
Good Advice is Beyond All Price, but What if it Comes from a Machine?Preprint
Hertz, N., & Wiese, E. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ajrv2 · Cited by 8
Zhang, J., Cao, J., & Meng, T. (2026) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-026-09944-x · Cited by 6
Constantinou, A., Hoole, A. C. F., Wong, D., Sagoo, G. S., Alvarez-Valle, J., Takeda, K., Griffiths, T., Edwards, A., Robinson, A., Stubbington, L., et al. (2024) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2024.10.032 · Cited by 4
Aly, H., Volonte, M., Byrne, K. A., & Knijnenburg, B. P. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713570 · Cited by 7
Banerjee, A. K., & Jhawar, A. (2025) · Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure · doi:10.1080/07053436.2025.2524196 · Cited by 4
What is Wrong With Automation Bias?
Jovchevski, P., Buijsman, S., & Neerincx, M. A. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01090-9 · Cited by 4
Advice from Robots: Would You Choose a Robot that Looked More or Less Human?
Kim, M. J., Getu, A., Sharp, H., & Wiese, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181321651121 · Cited by 4
Managerial Decisions in Marketing: The Individual Perception of Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Volkmar, G. V. (2022) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9268-0_2 · Cited by 5
Legal Knowledge-based Systems: The Blind Leading the Sheep?
Dijkstra, J. J. (2001) · International Review of Law Computers & Technology · doi:10.1080/13600860120070466 · Cited by 4
Self-citationHuman-Algorithm Interaction: Algorithmic Pricing in Hybrid Laboratory MarketsPreprint
Normann, H., & Sternberg, M. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3840789 · Cited by 4
Under Pressure: Examining Social Conformity with Computer and Robot GroupsPreprint
Hertz, N., & Wiese, E. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/trc9a · Cited by 4
The vigilance paradox: automation reliance inside the modern SOC
Tilbury, J., & Flowerday, S. (2026) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-08-2025-0318 · Cited by 3
Who Gets More Trust—AI or Humans, and Why? A Cross-Cultural Analysis of AI and Interpersonal Trust
Zhang, H., Jing, Y., & Gu, R. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16030320 · Cited by 3
Journalistic interventions matter: Understanding how Americans perceive fact-checking labels
Jia, C., & Lee, T. (2024) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-139 · Cited by 3
Bai, S., Wang, X., & Xia, J. (2026) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer21030097 · Cited by 2
Yokoi, R. (2024) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981241263350 · Cited by 2
Contribution to and use of online knowledge repositories: The role of governance mechanisms
Kayhan, V. O. (2010) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 2
Shaikh, S. J., & Cruz, I. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.12914 · Cited by 6
AI Resource Allocation: On the Contribution of Distributive and Procedural Fairness
Esch, C., Werner, D., Gross, M. E., Kals, E., & Pfeuffer, C. U. (2025) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3765766.3765776 · Cited by 1
Liu, J., Zhao, J., & Zhu, L. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103299 · Cited by 1
When AI and Humans Recommend Together: Trust Asymmetries in Dual-Source Recommender Systems
Luca, R. M., Kurt, A. G., Sénécal, S., Kounna, S., Coursaris, C. K., & Léger, P. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2674835 · Cited by 1
Yoo, K., & Ulrike Gretzel, B. (2011) · Cited by 1
Usage of Online Knowledge Repositories: A Comparison of Two Governance Mechanisms
Kayhan, V. O., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2010) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 1
When is Computerized Continuous Auditing Less Effective at Deterring Fraud
Gonzalez, G. C. (2012) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1
Kunkel, C., & Schoewe, J. (2021) · Angewandte Wirtschaftsinformatik · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-30936-7_2 · Cited by 1
Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2005) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1
On the use of computerised decision aids
Dijkstra, J. J. (2006)
Self-citationAn experience-based contrast effect when relying on a decision aid
Yuviler-Gavish, N., & Naseraldin, H. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-03236-6
Confidence and performance in different engineering tasks
MacRobert, C. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Forensic Engineering · doi:10.1680/jfoen.23.00001
9 KI-gestützte Entscheidungsunterstützungssysteme im Gesundheitswesen
Gaube, S., & Lermer, E. (2023) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111034706-009 · Cited by 1
AI Deployment Susceptibility: Challenges in Clinical Decision-Aid Implementation
Saadoun, O. N., ALLayith, R. A., Lafta, M. K., Shakir, K. H., Hussein, A. S., Al-Farouni, M., & Shareef, H. (2024) · International Conference on IoT, Communication and Automation Technology (ICICAT) · doi:10.1109/icicat62666.2024.10923094
Leffrang, D. (2025) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80119-8_12
The Impact of the Race of Intelligent Virtual Agents on the Trust in AI-Based Recommendations
Rittmann, A., Schmidt, S., & Steinicke, F. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3717511.3747083
(2025) · REST Journal on Emerging trends in Modelling and Manufacturing · doi:10.46632/jemm/11/3/6
Meier, L. J. (2026) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-025-09628-y · Cited by 1
Artificial intelligence and job automation: opening the “black-box” of the underlying mechanisms
Peng, G., Zhang, Y. J., & Li, Y.-M. (2026) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-026-00489-2
Applicant attraction in AI recruitment: The roles of warmth and competence
Magni, F., & Gong, Y. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101169
Consumer perception of price dispersion by artificial intelligence
Leo, X., & Huh, Y. E. (2026) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2026.07.002
Metadata
- Authors
- Dijkstra, J. J., Liebrand, W. B. G., & Timminga, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 155-163
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W1984763500
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- expert systems, persuasiveness, user beliefs, perceived objectivity, production rules
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review