A problem-based approach to the advancement of heuristics for socio-technical evaluation
Abstract
With ubiquitous, mobile computing, health care systems, and smart factories, socio-technical phenomena continue to emerge that challenge traditional design and evaluation methods. We perceive such phenomena as the intertwinement of technical artifacts and social practices. Previous work shows that there is no sufficient method to evaluate the quality of this socio-technical intertwinement. Hence, our goal was to develop socio-technical heuristics, in short ST-heuristics, that can be applied by individuals to detect issues. Drawing inspiration from the success of usability heuristics in the field of human–computer interaction, we first applied a literature review to develop an initial set of ST-heuristics derived from six domains comprising groupware/computer-support cooperative work, job design, usability, socio-technical design principles, privacy, and process design. We then conducted two studies to evaluate and improve this set using empirical data from 13 cases from health care, industry, and engineering education fields. In total, we analysed 306 problems. The results substantiate a final set of eight ST-heuristics which allow for evaluating the socio-technical intertwinement in situ. We perceive the contribution of this work as a starting point for evaluators to uncover crucial issues and to improve current practice. We discuss the developed set of ST-heuristics within existing literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The intertwinement between the social and technical dimensions and its evolution are the most crucial challenges of sociotechnical design.
“We suggest that the intertwinement between both and its evolution are the most crucial challenges of sociotechnical design (Fischer and Herrmann 2015;Herrmann et al. 2021).”
From Keeping the organization in the loop: a socio-technical extension of human-centered artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as Herrmann et al. 2021
Cites
A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016) · Journal of Chiropractic Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 · Cited by 29,639 · see citing works
Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces
Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992) · Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '92 · doi:10.1145/143457.143468 · Cited by 2,550 · see citing works
A Socio-Technical Approach to Systems Design
Mumford, E. (2000) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/pl00010345 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Herrmann, T., & Pfeiffer, S. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01391-5 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
“We suggest that the intertwinement between both and its evolution are the most crucial challenges of socio-technical design (Fischer and Herrmann 2015; Herrmann et al. 2021).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Herrmann, T., Jahnke, I., & Nolte, A.
- Affiliations
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- University of Missouri (US)
- University of Tartu (EE)
- Corresponding author
- Herrmann, Thomas
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-09-21
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3087-3109
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W3200228047
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry for Culture and Science of the State of NRW
- Research Institute for Social Development
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- usability heuristics, groupware, computer-supported cooperative work, job design, privacy, process design, health care system, smart factory, engineering education, in situ evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review