CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 856Psychometric Methodologies and TestingSurvey Methodology and NonresponsePlace Attachment and Urban Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking Internal Consistency in Cronbach’s Alpha

Vaske, Jerry J., Beaman, Jay, Sponarski, Carly C.·2017·Leisure Sciences
DOI 10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cronbach's alpha estimates the internal consistency of responses in multi-item bipolar scales. This article examined three research questions (RQ): (1) To what extent do inconsistencies exist in data (e.g., responses of −2 −2 2 2)? (2) Does the number of scale items influence the amount of inconsistency? (3) Does Cronbach's alpha mask inconsistencies? Data were obtained from 29 research projects (n = 10,616). Each survey had place attachment questions comprising two concepts: place identity and place dependence. Respondents were classified as consistent or inconsistent based on their responses to the place attachment questions. Results demonstrated that: (a) inconsistent response patterns existed in the data (RQ1), (b) number of scale items influenced amount of inconsistency (RQ2), and (c) alpha masked these inconsistencies (RQ3). Discussion focused on implications of these findings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dawes J., 2002, Australian Journal of Market Research, 10, 1
  2. Green S. B., 2005, Handbook of research in clinical psychology
  3. Likert R., 1932, Archives of Psychology, 140, 44
  4. Nunnally J. C., 1994, Psychometric theory

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–851 of 851

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Vaske, Jerry J.
ORCID
Venue
Leisure Sciences
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2016-05-06
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
163-173
ISSN
  • 0149-0400 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0588
DOI
10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189
OpenAlex
W2345483851
Cited by
856
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 146 · 2024: 149 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Leisure Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Keywords
Cronbach's alpha, internal consistency, bipolar scales, place attachment, place identity, place dependence, scale reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review