The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender‐based analysis of leisure constraints
Abstract
Using data derived from two provincewide surveys of the general public of Alberta, Canada, two empirical questions were addressed: (a) What constraints to leisure do women and men experience, and (b) how does the context of personal and situational circumstances (e.g., age, income, and family structure) filter the effects of constraints among women and men ? Several differences emerged between women and men in terms of the intensity and nature of the constraints, leading to the conclusion that women are overall more constrained in their leisure than men. The data also demonstrate that the experience of leisure constraints is characterized by as many within‐gender differences as between‐gender differences. Selected context variables related to age, income, and family structure are mediating factors that alter, reinforce, or alleviate constraints for women, depending on the nature of the context and on the type of constraint. The study points to the need to think in terms of diversities and pluralities rather than dualisms and universals. From theoretical gender perspectives, we conclude that constraints to leisure for women are a function of cultural interpretations of gender and not just biological sex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender: a useful category of historical analysis
Scott, J. W. (1986) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1864376 · Cited by 4,184
Cited by
Assessing Hierarchical Leisure Constraints Theory after Two Decades
Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W., & Shen, X. S. (2010) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.1080/00222216.2010.11950197 · Cited by 401
A Critique of Leisure Constraints: Comparative Analyses and Understandings
Samdahl, D. M., & Jekubovich, N. J. (1997) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.1080/00222216.1997.11949807 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, E. L., & Henderson, K. A.
- Venue
- Leisure Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-51
- ISSN
- 0149-0400 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0588
- OpenAlex
- W2108378531
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender‐based analysis of leisure constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01490409509513241
- The paper
- Jackson, E. L., & Henderson, K. A. (1995). Gender‐based analysis of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409509513241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.