The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Hierarchical Leisure Constraints Theory after Two Decades
Abstract
This article assesses the status of hierarchical leisure constraints theory (Crawford & Godbey, 1987; Crawford, Jackson, & Godbey, 1991) regarding many issues. Such issues include clarification and elaboration of some aspects of the original model, a review of studies which have used or examined the model and the extent to which they are confirmatory, critiques of the original model by various authors, and avenues for further research. Conclusions drawn include that the model is cross culturally relevant, that the model may examine forms of behavior other than leisure, and that, while research to date has been largely confirmatory, there is a high potential for the theory to be expanded in order to advance leisure constraints research to the next level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,122
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2769 · Cited by 15,614
Mind, Self, and Society: The Definitive Edition
Mead, G. H., Joas, H., Huebner, D. R., & Morris, C. W. (2015) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226112879.001.0001 · Cited by 11,018
A hierarchical model of leisure constraints
Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490409109513147 · Cited by 1,490
Self-citationReconceptualizing barriers to family leisure
Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1987) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490408709512151 · Cited by 1,273
Self-citationPersonal Relationships: Their Structures and Processes
Kelley, H. H. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 689
Leisure studies: prospects for the Twenty-First Century.
Jackson, E. L., & Burton, T. L. (1999) · Cited by 653
Journal of Career Development: A 36-Year Content Analysis (1972–2007)
Chaichanasakul, A., He, Y., Chen, H.-H., Allen, G. E. K., Khairallah, T. S., & Ramos, K. (2011) · Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/0894845310380223 · Cited by 549
Cited by
A systematic review of dropout from organized sport among children and youth
Crane, J., & Temple, V. (2015) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x14555294 · Cited by 502
Shen, X., MacDonald, M., Logan, S. W., Parkinson, C., Gorrell, L., & Hatfield, B. E. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031081 · Cited by 64
“, intrapersonal and interpersonal constraints) [86] and corresponding adaptive behaviors that may inform intervention designs.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W., & Shen, X. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Leisure Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-134
- ISSN
- 0022-2216 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-6417
- OpenAlex
- W2157642223
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Hierarchical Leisure Constraints Theory after Two Decades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00222216.2010.11950197
- The paper
- Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W., & Shen, X. S. (2010). Assessing Hierarchical Leisure Constraints Theory after Two Decades. Journal of Leisure Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2010.11950197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
