Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of bacterial exopolymer adhesion on the entrainment of sand

Dade, W. Brian, Davis, John D., Nichols, Peter D., Nowell, Arthur R.M., Thistle, David, Trexler, Melanie B., White, David C.·1990·Geomicrobiology Journal

Abstract

Flow velocity required to erode a bed of acid‐washed sand is increased by intergranular adhesion resulting from growth of the benthic marine bacterium Al‐teromonas atlantica. In general, we find that either pure exopolymer alone or exopolymer generated during in situ growth increases erosion resistance of fine quartz sand. Moreover, the degree of erosion resistance increases in proportion to the concentration of exopolymer‐component uronic acids, which in turn is dependent on relative nitrogen content of peptone‐based growth media. Specifically, we observe that approximately 100 nmol of exopolymer or 1.5 nmol of component uronic acids generated by in situ bacterial growth under nitrogen‐rich conditions per gram of dry sediment can effectively double seawater‐flume flow velocity required for initiation of transport of otherwise noncohesive, 125–177 μm quartz grains. This maximal effect corresponds to an estimated adhesive force that exceeds submerged particle weight by an order of magnitude and exceeds particle‐specific uronic acids weight by seven orders of magnitude. Rapid analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry of purified exopolymer obtained from A. atlantica cultures shows it to be a polysaccharide containing approximately 20% uronic acids by weight. Maximal exopolymer and component uronic acid concentrations generated in these experiments are an order of magnitude less than values previously reported for estuarine sediments. These results are the first to correlate specific exopolymer components with sediment erosion resistance and further demonstrate the importance of microbial exudates in sediment binding believed to occur in a wide range of marine environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01490459009377874

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Dade, W. B., Davis, J. D., Nichols, P. D., Nowell, A. R. M., Thistle, D., Trexler, M. B., & White, D. C.
Venue
Geomicrobiology Journal
Published
1990-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 0149-0451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0529
OpenAlex
W2163142510
Cited by
185
References
0
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of bacterial exopolymer adhesion on the entrainment of sand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01490459009377874
The paper
Dade, W. B., Davis, J. D., Nichols, P. D., Nowell, A. R. M., Thistle, D., Trexler, M. B., & White, D. C. (1990). Effects of bacterial exopolymer adhesion on the entrainment of sand. Geomicrobiology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490459009377874

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.