Cited by 175Metal Extraction and BioleachingMine drainage and remediation techniquesMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Geomicrobiology of pyrite (FeS2) dissolution: Case study at Iron Mountain, California

Katrina J. Edwards, Brett M. Goebel·1999·Geomicrobiology Journal

Abstract

Geomicrobiology of pyrite weathering at Iron Mountain, CA, was investigated by molecular biological, surface chemical, surface structural, and solution chemical methods in both laboratory and field-based studies. Research focused at sites both within and peripheral to the ore-body. The acid-generating areas we have examined thus far at Iron Mountain (solution pH <1.0, temperature> 35 C) were populated by species other than Thiobacillus ferrooxidans . 16S rDNA bacterial sequence analysis and domain- and specieslevel oligonucleotide probe-based investigations confirmed the presence of planktonic Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and indicated the existence of other species apparently related to other newly described acidophilic chemolithotrophs. T. ferrooxidans was confined to relatively moderate environments (pH 2-3, 20-30 C) that were peripheral to the orebody. Dissolution rate measurements indicated that, per cell, attached and planktonic species contributed comparably in acid release. Surface colonization experiments in the laboratory and field indicated that attachment was specific to sulfides instead of to silicates, occurred in crystallographically preferred orientations, and, after cell division, resulted in a monolayer of cells at a maximum density of 8 X 106 cells cm2. In situ geochemical characterization throughout the year revealed that the microbial community that controlled acid generation varied and could be correlated with seasonal and spatial fluctuations in geochemical conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/014904599270668

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Appropriate bacteria for bioleaching include Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, and A. thiooxidans.

    “Appropriate bacteria for bioleaching include Leptospirillum ferrooxidans (an iron oxidizer), Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (an iron and sulfur oxidizer), and A. thiooxidans (a sulfur oxidizer) [64,66].”

    From Strategizing carbon-neutral mines: A case for pilot projects (2014) · cites this paper as [66]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 175

Authors
Katrina J. Edwards, B. M. G.
Venue
Geomicrobiology Journal
Published
1999-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
155-179
ISSN
  • 0149-0451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0529
OpenAlex
W2108344629
Cited by
175
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geomicrobiology Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
pyrite dissolution, pyrite weathering, acid mine drainage, Iron Mountain, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, crystal orientation, bacterioplankton, microbial community dynamics, 16S rRNA gene, oligonucleotide probes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review