Liquid‐Liquid Extraction of Tetravalent Hafnium from Acidic Chloride Solutions using Bis(2,4,4‐trimethylpentyl) Dithiophosphinic Acid (Cyanex 301)
Abstract
Liquid‐liquid extraction studies of tetravalent hafnium from acidic chloride solutions have been carried out with bis(2,4,4‐trimethylpentyl) dithiophosphinic acid (Cyanex 301) as an extractant diluted in kerosene. Increase of acid concentration decreases the percentage extraction of metal. Plot of log D vs. log [HCl] gave a straight line with a negative slope of 2±0.1 indicating the exchange of two moles of hydrogen ions for every mole of Hf(IV) extractacted into the organic phase. Extraction of Hf(IV) increases with increase of extractant concentration. The plot of log D vs. log [HA] is linear with slope 2±0.1, indicating the association of two moles of extractant with the extracted metal species. The addition of sodium salts enhanced the percentage extraction of metal, and followed the order NaSCN>Na2SO4> NaNO3>NaCl. Stripping of metal from the loaded organic (LO) with HCl and H2SO4 indicated sulphuric acid as the best stripping agent. Increase of temperature increases the percentage extraction of metal indicating the process is endothermic. Regeneration and recycling capacity of Cyanex 301, extraction behavior of associated elements such as Zr(IV), Ti(IV), Al(III), Fe(III), and IR spectra of the Hf(IV)‐Cyanex 301 complex was studied.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There was no significant difference in the extraction and stripping efficiency of the extractant within a 10 cycle operation.
“The results revealed no significant di erence in the extraction and stripping e ciency of the extractant within a 10 cycle operation [67,68].”
From Review on the Comparison of the Chemical Reactivity of Cyanex 272, Cyanex 301 and Cyanex 302 for Their Application to Metal Separation from Acid Media (2020) · cites this paper as [68]
Cyanex 301/302 have high stability during extraction and stripping for Hf(IV) from a 0.1 M HCl solution.
“Similarly, the investigation on the recycling ability of Cyanex 301 / 302 for the extraction of Hf(IV) from a 0.1 M HCl solution indicated their high stability during extraction and stripping.”
From Review on the Comparison of the Chemical Reactivity of Cyanex 272, Cyanex 301 and Cyanex 302 for Their Application to Metal Separation from Acid Media (2020) · cites this paper as [68]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Rajesh Kumar, J., Ramachandra Reddy, B., Janardhan Reddy, K., & Varada Reddy, A.
- Venue
- Separation Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 865-877
- ISSN
- 0149-6395 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5754
- OpenAlex
- W1981316539
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Separation Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Keywords
- hafnium, liquid-liquid extraction, Cyanex 301, chloride solutions, extraction kinetics, hydrogen ion exchange, stripping, zirconium, titanium, aluminum, iron
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review