CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Performance of activated carbon derived from Cymbopogon winterianus distillation waste for scavenging of aqueous toxic anionic dye Congo red: Comparison with commercial activated carbon

Saha, Ajoy, Basak, Biraj Bandhu, Ponnuchamy, Manivel·2020·Separation Science and Technology
DOI 10.1080/01496395.2019.1620277
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Activated carbon derived from distillation waste of java citronella (Cymbopogon winterianus) by phosphoric acid activation along with commercial activated carbon was evaluated for their scavenging potential toward toxic anionic dye Congo red. Prepared activated carbon was characterized with Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope, and points zero charge (pHzp). Commercial activated carbon scavenged higher quantity of dye than prepared activated carbon; however, dye uptake rate was faster onto latter. Adsorption behavior is best represented by Freundlich equilibrium and pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Thermodynamics parameters indicate the exothermic nature of reaction. Desorption study allows the superior recycle performance of prepared activated carbon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01496395.2019.1620277

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recovery of powder-activated carbons is very costly, time-consuming, and not very efficient, making them unsuitable for industrial applications, and reusability is almost impossible for low-cost products.

    “Some authors stated that the recovery step of powder-activated carbons is very costly, time-consuming, and not very efficient so that they are not suitable for industrial applications (Moosavi et al., 2020), and more particularly reusability is almost impossible for low-cost products (Saha et al., 2020).”

    From Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Saha et al., 2020

  • Congo red-loaded java citronella bio-adsorbent and commercial activated carbon showed 90.3% and 83.7% desorption, respectively, and the adsorbents were effective up to two adsorption-desorption cycles.

    “They found 90.3 and 83.7% desorption for biomass and commercial AC, respectively, from dye-loaded adsorbents (Saha et al., 2020).Moreover, the adsorbents were effective up to two adsorption-desorption cycles.”

    From Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Saha et al., 2020

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1080/00986445.2017.1399366 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.021 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.042 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.117 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/clen.201400011 · DOI
  6. 10.14233/ajchem · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.11.008 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.cej.2004.06.011 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/sia.2716 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10725-013-9875-7 · DOI
  11. Nandapure, S.P.; Wankhade, S.G.; Jadhao, S.M.; Bhoyar, S.M.; Wanjari, S.S.; Sarode, R.B. (2016) Quality parameters of java citronella oil as influenced by nutrient management under inceptisols. International Journal of Tropical Agricultural, 34 (3): 579–584.
  12. 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.108 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.027 · DOI
  14. Jackson, M.L.;. (1975) Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India: New Delhi. 183–226.
  15. Nelson, D.W.; Somme’s, L.E. (1982) Total carbon and organic carbon and organic matter. Page, A.L.; Miller, R.H.; Keeney, D.R. editors. Method of Soil Analysis: American Society of Agronomy: Madison. 539–579. · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.034 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.020 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.074 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.psep.2017.12.007 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/apj.2179 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.071 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.024 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.020 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.111 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s13201-015-0358-z · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.105 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s00128-011-0304-1 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.015 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11356-012-0947-4 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/ep.12872 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.008 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10668-016-9902-8 · DOI
  33. 10.3390/ma8074147 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.10.023 · DOI
  35. 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000013305.99473.cf · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s13201-015-0375-y · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.02.040 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.psep.2015.09.015 · DOI
  39. Hanna, O.T.; Sandall, O.C. (1995) Computational Methods in Chemical Engineering, Prentice– Hall International: New Jersey.
  40. 10.1023/A:1010694910170 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s11356-018-2192-y · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.07.001 · DOI
  43. 10.1061/JSEDAI.0000430 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/ja02242a004 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Freundlich, H.;. (1906) Adsorption in solution. Physical Chemical Society, 40: 1361–1368.
  46. Temkin, M.J.; Pyzhev, V. (1940) Kinetics of ammonia synthesis on promoted iron catalysts. Acta Physiochim URSS, 12: 217–222.
  47. 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.12.018 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s10853-017-1705-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Saha, A., Basak, B. B., & Ponnuchamy, M.
Affiliations
ICAR-Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Anand, India
ORCID
Basak, Biraj Bandhu
Venue
Separation Science and Technology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-05-28
Volume
55
Issue
11
Pages
1970-1983
ISSN
  • 0149-6395
  • 1520-5754
DOI
10.1080/01496395.2019.1620277
Cited by
35
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review