The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Integration of Disabled Children into Regular Schools
Abstract
Regular and resource teachers from New South Wales government and nongovernment schools were surveyed to elicit their attitudes towards the integration of individual disabled chldren, the support services currently provided and the skills considered essential for teachers of mainstreamed atypical students. Differences among sub‐groups of teachers and between teachers and principals who had completed the same questionnaire in a previous study were also examined. Results indicate that teachers’ attitudes to the integration of individual disabled children reflect lack of confidence both in their own instructional skills and in the quality of support personnel currently provided to them. They are positive about integrating only those children whose disabling characteristics are not likely to require extra instructional or management skills on the part of the teacher. However, teachers’ attitudes may be significantly modified by their pre‐service training and the nature of their subsequent professional experience. Examination of the skills needed by mainstreaming staff reveals that, while general competence is considered essential, neither regular nor resource teachers seem aware of the need for a structured approach to curriculum objectives. The finding that principals’ attitudes arc consistently more positive than those expressed by teachers suggests a somewhat unrealistic perception by the former of teachers’ current anxieties about integration. Implications of these findings for policy and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Teacher Perceptions of Mainstreaming/Inclusion, 1958–1995: A Research Synthesis
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1996) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440299606300106 · Cited by 1,020
Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming
Lindsay, G. (2007) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709906x156881 · Cited by 725
“For example, Blackman (1967:8) quoted in Christoplos and Renz (1969) argues that a study by Goldstein, Moss, and Jordan (1965) ‘blends into the long line of negative findings that have characterized this area of research for the past 30 years’ by failing to indicate the superiority of special classes.”
BackgroundSharma, U., Forlin, C., & Loreman, T. (2008) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687590802469271 · Cited by 566
Teacher, Student, and School Attributes as Predictors of Teachers' Responses to Inclusion
Soodak, L. C., Podell, D. M., & Lehman, L. R. (1998) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/002246699803100405 · Cited by 406
Can a competence or standards model facilitate an inclusive approach to teacher education?
Moran, A. (2009) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603110701273675 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Center, Y., & Ward, J.
- Venue
- The Exceptional Child
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-56
- ISSN
- 0156-6555 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2619113385
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Integration of Disabled Children into Regular Schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0156655870340105
- The paper
- Center, Y., & Ward, J. (1987). Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Integration of Disabled Children into Regular Schools. The Exceptional Child. https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655870340105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.