Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Supervision – the most variable of variables: student perspectives

McAlpine, Lynn, McKinnon, Margot·2013·Studies in Continuing Education

Abstract

The supervision literature often conceptualizes the supervisor as the primary person in doctoral students' progress. Yet, there is growing evidence that the supervisor is but one of many resources that students draw on. Our study takes up this idea in answering the question: What is students' experience of their supervisory relationships over time? Sixteen social science participants in two UK universities, at different points in their doctoral journeys, completed logs of a week's activities for a number of months before being interviewed. This distinct longitudinal approach provides a more nuanced understanding of students' perceptions of the supervisory relationship, specifically, varied reasons for seeking supervisory help, distinct needs related to where students were in their progress, and diverse in which they negotiated and characterized the supervisory relationship.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0158037x.2012.746227

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1007/BF01383939 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/14703290903068805 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x · DOI
  4. 10.12930/0271-9517-30.1.34 · DOI
  5. Bourner T., 1991, Higher Education Review, 24, 21
  6. Bowen W.G., 1992, In pursuit of the PhD, 10.1515/9781400862474 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/0309877X.2010.484056 · DOI
  8. 10.3102/0013189X09353787 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/01411920902834191 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/13562510802193905 · DOI
  11. Elliott J., 2005, Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 10.4135/9780857020246 · DOI
  12. 10.1108/09684880210423582 · DOI
  13. Golde C.M., 2001, At cross purposes: What the experiences of today's doctoral students reveal about doctoral education
  14. 10.1080/07294360220124648 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/0158037X.2010.487482 · DOI
  16. McAlpine L., 2010, Becoming an academic: International perspectives, 125, 10.1007/978-0-230-36509-4_6 · DOI
  17. 10.1108/1759751X201100007 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/13562517.2011.570432 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/0309877X.2011.643777 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/0260293980230303 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/0022-0167.54.2.211 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/00330124.2010.533547 · DOI
  24. Stake R.E., 2006, Multiple case study analysis
  25. 10.1080/03075070903243092 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/03098770701424983 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 77

Metadata

Authors
McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M.
Venue
Studies in Continuing Education
Published
2013-11
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
265-280
ISSN
  • 0158-037X
  • 1470-126X
Cited by
77
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supervision – the most variable of variables: student perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0158037x.2012.746227
The paper
McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M. (2013). Supervision – the most variable of variables: student perspectives. Studies in Continuing Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037x.2012.746227