Cited by 30Online Learning and AnalyticsDigital Education and SocietyBig Data Technologies and Applications

Digital analytics in professional work and learning

Open access
Edwards, Richard, Fenwick, Tara·2016·Studies in Continuing Education

Abstract

In a wide range of fields, professional practice is being transformed by the increasing influence of digital analytics: the massive volumes of big data, and software algorithms that are collecting, comparing and calculating that data to make predictions and even decisions. Researchers in a number of social sciences have been calling attention to the far-reaching and accelerating consequences of these forces, claiming that many professionals, researchers, policy-makers and the public are just beginning to realise the enormous potentials and challenges these analytics are producing. Yet, outside of particular areas of research and practice, such as learning analytics, there has been little discussion of this to date in the broader education literature. This article aims to set out some key issues particularly relevant to the understandings of professional practice, knowledge and learning posed by the linkages of big data and software code. It begins by outlining definitions, forms and examples of these analytics, their potentialities and some of the hidden impact, and then presents issues for researchers and educators. It seeks to contribute to and extend debates taking place in certain quarters to a broader professional education and work audience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0158037x.2015.1074894

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BD often aggregates varied online activities such as tweets, retweets, microblogging, and likes on Facebook that bear diverse meanings and senses.

    “BD often aggregates varied online activities such as tweetsretweets, microblogging, and likes on Facebook that essentially bear diverse meanings and senses (Edwards & Fenwick, 2015).”

    From Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods (2017) · cites this paper as Edwards & Fenwick, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Adkins, L., and C. Lury. 2012. "Introduction: Special Measures." The Sociological Review 59: 5-23.
  2. Barocas, S., S. Hood, and M. Ziewitz. 2013. "Governing Algorithms: A Provocation Piece." Paper prepared for the Governing Algorithms conference, New York University, New York, May 16-17.
  3. Berry, D. 2011. The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Blum, A. 2012. Tubes: Behind the Scenes at the Internet. London: Penguin Books.
  5. Bowker, G. 2005. Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  6. Bowker, G., and S. Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  7. Edwards, P. 2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Edwards, R. 2015. "Software and the Hidden Curriculum in Digital Education." Pedagogy, Culture & Society 23 (2): 265-279.
  9. Edwards, R., and P. Carmichael. 2012. "Secret Codes: The Hidden Curriculum of the Semantic Web." Discourse 33 (4): 575-590.
  10. Eriksson-Zetterquist, U., K. Lindberg, and A. Styhre. 2009. "When the Good Times Are Over: Professionals Encountering New Technology." Human Relations 62 (8): 1145-1170.
  11. Fenwick, T. 2014. "Rethinking Professional Responsibility: Matters of Account." In Reconceptualising Professional Learning: Sociomaterial Knowledges and Practices, edited by T. Fenwick and M. Nerland, 157-170. London: Routledge.
  12. Fenwick, T., R. Edwards, and P. Sawchuk. 2011. Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Sociomaterial. London: Routledge.
  13. Finn, M. 2015. "Atmospheres of Progress in a Data-based School." Cultural Geographies 1-21. doi:10.1177/1474474015575473 · DOI
  14. Gasevic, D., S. Dawson, and G. Siemens. 2015. "Let's Not Forget: Learning Analytics Are about Learning." TechTrends 59 (1): 64-71.
  15. Halford, S., C. Pope, and M. Weal. 2012. "Digital Futures? Sociological Challenges and Opportunities in the Emergent Semantic Web." Sociology 47 (1): 173-189.
  16. Hoyles, C., R. Noss, P. Kent, and A. Bakker. 2010. Improving Mathematics at Work: The Need for Techno-mathematical Literacies. Abingdon: Routledge.
  17. Jeffrey, A. 2015. "Methodological Challenges in Examining the Impact of Healthcare Predictive Analytics on Nursing-sensitive Patient Outcomes." PubMed Commons, June 1, 2015. http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25899442.
  18. Kallinikos, J. 2010. Governing Through Technology: Information Artefacts and Social Practice. London: Palgrave.
  19. Kitchin, R. 2013. "Big Data and Human Geography: Opportunities, Challenges and Risks." Dialogues in Human Geography 3 (3): 262-267.
  20. Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2011. Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  21. Knight, S., S. Buckingham Shum, and K. Littleton. 2014. "Epistemology, Assessment, Pedagogy: Where Learning Meets Analytics in the Middle Space." Journal of Learning Analytics 1 (2): 23-47.
  22. Lampland, M., and S. Star, eds. 2009. Standards and Their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  23. Laurillard, D. 2012. Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. London: Routledge.
  24. Law, J., and W. Bijker. 1992. "Postscript: Technology, Stability and Social Theory." In Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by W. Bijker and J. Law, 290-308. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  25. Manovich, L. 2013. Software Takes Command: Extending the Language of New Media. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  26. Orlikowski, W. 2007. "Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work." Organisation Studies 28 (9): 1435-1448.
  27. Orlikowski, W. 2010. "The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research." Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 125-141.
  28. Orlikowski, W., and C. Iacono. 2001. "Desperately Seeking the 'IT' in IT Research -A Call to Theorising the IT Artefact." Information Systems Research 12 (2): 121-134.
  29. Siegel, E. 2013. Predictive Analytics: The Power to Predict Who Will Click, Buy, Lie, or Die. Oxford: John Wiley.
  30. Susskind, R. 2013. Tomorrow's Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Williamson, B. 2014. "Governing Software: Networks, Databases and Algorithmic Power in the Digital Governance of Education." Learning, Media & Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 17439884.2014.924527. · DOI
  32. Williamson, B. 2015. "Algorithmic Skin: Health-tracking Technologies, Personal Analytics and the Biopedagogies of Digitised Health and Physical Education." Sport, Education & Society 20 (1): 133-151.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, R., & Fenwick, T.
Affiliations
University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Richard
Venue
Studies in Continuing Education
Published
2015-08-28
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
213-227
ISSN
  • 0158-037X (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-126X
OpenAlex
W2095966632
Cited by
30
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Studies in Continuing Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L001160/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
Keywords
digital analytics, big data, professional practice, professional learning, learning analytics, software algorithms, professional education, professional activity, knowledge and learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review