Cited by 119Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionOnline Learning and AnalyticsData Privacy and Cybersecurity

Student privacy self-management: implications for learning analytics

Prinsloo, Paul, Slade, Sharon·2015·Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge

Abstract

Optimizing the harvesting and analysis of student data promises to clear the fog surrounding the key drivers of student success and retention, and provide potential for improved student success. At the same time, concerns are increasingly voiced around the extent to which individuals are routinely and progressively tracked as they engage online. The Internet, the very thing that promised to open up possibilities and to break down communication barriers, now threatens to narrow it again through the panopticon of mass surveillance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2723576.2723585

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nudging techniques direct students toward particular learning resources or to change their behaviors.

    “So-called “nudging” techniques direct students toward particular learning resources or to change their behaviors.90”
  • Prinsloo and Slade (2015) found several troubling gaps in MOOC providers' fiduciary duty to students and their consideration for privacy issues and resulting student vulnerability.

    “In an analysis of the TACs of three providers of massive open online courses (MOOCs) namely Coursera, EdX, and FutureLearn, Prinsloo and Slade (2015) found several troubling gaps in both the providers' fiduciary duty to students and their consideration for the inherent privacy issues and resulting student vulnerability.”

    From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Prinsloo & Slade, 2015

  • It is increasingly possible that student data may be used inappropriately and unethically, further increasing the vulnerability of students.

    “Though the intention of collecting and using student data arguably falls within the scope of the fiduciary duty of higher education, it is increasingly possible that student data may be also used inappropriately and unethically, further increasing the vulnerability of students (Prinsloo & Slade, 2015).”

    From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Prinsloo & Slade, 2015

  • Individuals may adapt decisions about how much information they are prepared to share, and for what purpose, depending on the context.

    “Individuals may adapt decisions regarding how much information they are prepared to share (and for what purpose) depending on the context.”

    From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Prinsloo & Slade, 2015

  • HEIs are increasingly vulnerable and must optimize their use of data, in particular student data.

    “In this context, HEIs are increasingly vulnerable and must optimize their use of data, in particular student data (Baker & Siemens, 2014;Gašević & Siemens, 2015;Prinsloo & Slade, 2015).”

    From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Prinsloo & Slade, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S.
Affiliations
  • University of South Africa (ZA)
  • The Open University (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-03-16
Pages
83-92
OpenAlex
W2142141517
Cited by
119
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 2
FWCI
46.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Data Privacy and Cybersecurity
Keywords
student privacy, self-management, student data, online tracking, mass surveillance, panopticon, student success, student retention, data harvesting, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review