Understanding social presence in text‐based online learning environments
Abstract
This article reports on key aspects of a theory generative study into social presence in text‐based online learning environments. The focus of the article is the nature of social presence as experienced by online learners in those environments. Employing a collective case study design, the study accessed online learners’ experience‐based heuristic knowledge through a multi‐phase dialogical process which functioned as an extended interview. Among the key findings was (a) a definition of social presence drawn from learners’ experiences; (b) explication of the nature of social presence in online learning environments; (c) suggestions for the creation and sustenance of social presence in those environments; and (d) support for a relational view of social presence which emphasizes human agency in mediated social processes and foreshadows a role for social presence as a critical element of online learning environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research about online learning supports the idea that student engagement is crucial to student success.
“In general, the research about online learning supports the idea that student engagement is crucial to student success (Dennen et al., 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea et al., 2006; Swan et al., 2000).”
From Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) (2015) · cites this paper as Kehrwald, 2008
Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning.
“Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning (Dennen, Darabi, & Smith, 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea, Li, & Pickett, 2006; Swan, Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, Pelz, & Maher, 2000).”
From Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) (2015) · cites this paper as Kehrwald, 2008
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE)
Dixson, M. D. (2015) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v19i4.561 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
“Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning (Dennen, Darabi, & Smith, 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea, Li, & Pickett, 2006; Swan, Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, Pelz, & Maher, 2000).”
BackgroundDixson, M. D., Greenwell, M. R., Rogers-Stacy, C., Weister, T., & Lauer, S. (2017) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1209222 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Influence of Rapport and Social Presence with an Ai Psychotherapy Chatbot on Users’ Self-Disclosure
Lee, J., Lee, J.-G., & Lee, D. (2022) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4063508 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kehrwald, B.
- Affiliations
- Massey University (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Kehrwald, Benjamin
- Venue
- Distance Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-106
- ISSN
- 0158-7919 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-0198
- OpenAlex
- W2114703220
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 65.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Distance Education (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- social presence, virtual learning environments, student experience, human agency, theory generation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review