Cited by 191Online Learning and AnalyticsOnline and Blended LearningOpen Education and E-Learning

Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap

Open access
Henderikx, Maartje A., Kreijns, Karel, Kalz, Marco·2017·Distance Education

Abstract

In this paper we present an alternative typology for determining success and dropout in massive open online courses (MOOCs). This typology takes the perspectives of MOOC-takers into account and is based on the their intentions and subsequent behaviour. An explorative study using two MOOCs was carried out to test the applicability of the typology. Following the traditional approach based on course completion to identify educational success, success rates were 6.5 and 5.6%. The success rates from the perspectives of the MOOC-taker were 59 and 70%. These findings demonstrate that merely looking at course completion as a measure for success does not suffice in the context of MOOCs. This change in addressing MOOC success and dropout provides an alternative view and demonstrates the importance of MOOC-takers’ perspectives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hackathons, citizen laboratories, and maker communities promote collaborative experimentation and the creation of solutions with social impact.

    “Hackathons, laboratorios ciudadanos y comunidades makers promueven la experimentación colaborativa y la creación de soluciones con impacto social (Henderikx et al., 2017).”

    From Entre Códigos y Corazones: Investigación e Inteligencia Artificial hacia una Tecnología más Humana (2025) · cites this paper as Henderikx et al., 2017

    The Introduction and Discussion address MOOC participation, success, and dropout, not hackathons, citizen laboratories, or maker communities. Searches for those settings and for collaborative experimentation producing socially impactful solutions found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University Rochester Press.
  3. Eisenberg, E., & Dowsett, T. (1990). Student drop-out from a distance education project course: A new method of analysis. Distance Education, 11, 231-253. doi:10.1080/0158791900110205 · DOI
  4. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. doi:10.2307/2065853 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Garrison, D. R. (1987). Researching dropout in distance education. Distance Education, 8, 95-101. doi:10.1080/0158791870080107 · DOI
  6. Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E., & Shaw, D. (2014). Who says there is an intention-behaviour gap? Assessing the empirical evidence of an intention-behaviour gap in ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 1-18. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2440-0 · DOI
  7. Huin, L., Bergheaud, Y., Caron, P. A., Codina, A., & Disson, E. (2016). Measuring completion and dropout in MOOCs: A learner-centered model. In M. Khalil, M. Ebner, M. Koop, A. Lorenz, & M. Kalz (Eds.), Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2016 (pp. 55-68). Norderstedt: Books on Demand GmbH.
  8. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15, 133-160. doi:10.19173/irrodl. v15i1.1651 · DOI
  9. Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 341-358. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112 · DOI
  10. Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., Walhout, J., Castaño-Munoz, J., Espasa, A., & Tovar, E. (2015). Establishing a European cross-provider data collection about open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 62-77. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2150 · DOI
  11. Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., Kirschner, P. A., Buuren, H., & Acker, F. (2013). Adopting the Integrative Model of Behaviour Prediction to explain teachers' willingness to use ICT: A perspective for research on teachers' ICT usage in pedagogical practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22, 55-71. doi:1 0.1080/1475939X.2012.754371 · DOI
  12. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Parslow, P., & Williams, S. A. (2014). Dropout: MOOC participants' perspective. In U. Kress, & C. Delgado Kloos (Eds.), Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014 (pp. 95-100). Lausanne: eLearning Papers.
  13. McBroom, W. H., & Reed, F. W. (1992). Toward a reconceptualization of attitude-behavior consistency. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 205-216. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786946
  14. Peters, O. (1971). Theoretical aspects of correspondence instruction. In O. MacKenzie, & E. L. Christensen (Eds.), The changing world of correspondence study: International readings (pp. 223-228). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  15. Peters, O. (1992). Some observations on dropping out in distance education. Distance Education, 13, 234-269. doi:10.1080/0158791920130206 · DOI
  16. Roberts, D. (1984). Ways and means of reducing early student drop-out rates. Distance Education, 5, 50-71. doi:10.1080/0158791840050104 · DOI
  17. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Self-schemas and the theory of planned behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 533-550. doi:10.1002/1099-0992(200007/08)30: 4<533::AID-EJSP6>3.0.CO;2-F Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1317-1338. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01679.x · DOI
  18. Sweet, R. (1986). Student dropout in distance education: An application of Tinto's model. Distance Education, 7, 201-213. doi:10.1080/0158791860070204 · DOI
  19. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125. doi:10.2307/1170024 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Tinto, V. (1982). Defining dropout: A matter of perspective. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1982, 3-15. doi:10.1002/ir.37019823603 · DOI
  21. Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37, 208-223. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M.
Affiliations
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Corresponding author
Henderikx, Maartje A.
Venue
Distance Education
Published
2017-09-02
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
353-368
ISSN
  • 0158-7919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-0198
OpenAlex
W2754780169
Cited by
191
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 14
FWCI
23.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Distance Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Dutch National Initiative for Education Research (NRO) (405-15-705)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Education and E-Learning
Keywords
massive open online courses, MOOC dropout, intention-behavior gap, learner intentions, learner behavior, course completion, learner perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review