The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward Critical Media Literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy
Abstract
Media literacy education is not as advanced in the USA as in several other English speaking areas, such as Great Britain, Canada, and Australia. Despite decades of struggle since the 1970s by individuals and groups, media education is still only reaching a small percentage of K–12 schools in the US. While some major inroads have been made, such as getting elements of media literacy included in most of the 50 state's educational standards and the launching of two national media education organizations, most teachers and students in the USA are not aware of issues involved in media literacy education. In this paper we set forth some models of media literacy, delineate key concepts of critical media literacy, and then examine some of the most active organizations in the USA and differences in their goals and pedagogy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man
Levine, S., & McLuhan, M. (1964) · American Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2711172 · Cited by 12,311
(2015) · Ethics and Education (Routledge Revivals) · doi:10.4324/9781315712383-22 · Cited by 10,891
Moore, E. C., & Dewey, J. (1917) · The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods · doi:10.2307/2940197 · Cited by 6,772
Shanahan, D. (1988) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/0362-3319(88)90048-1 · Cited by 1,761
(2004) · Cited by 1,752
Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79
(2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203381182 · Cited by 1,728
Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business
Postman, N. (2010) · Cited by 1,698
(1982) · Capital & Class · doi:10.1177/030981688201600108 · Cited by 1,212
Rich media, poor democracy: communication politics in dubious times
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-0115 · Cited by 1,197
INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNICATION STUDIES
Fiske, J. (1982) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203323212 · Cited by 1,130
Cited by
Media Literacy Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review
Jeong, S.-H., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x · Cited by 490
Critical media literacy is not an option
Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2007) · Learning Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11519-007-0004-2 · Cited by 366
Self-citationReconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media
Höttecke, D., & Allchin, D. (2020) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21575 · Cited by 303
Evaluating Media Literacy Education: Concepts, Theories and Future Directions
Martens, H. (2010) · Journal of Media Literacy Education · doi:10.23860/jmle-2-1-1 · Cited by 253
Polizzi, G. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103859 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Kellner, D., & Share, J.
- Venue
- Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 369-386
- ISSN
- 0159-6306 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3739
- OpenAlex
- W2163800845
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 145.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Critical Media Literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01596300500200169
- The paper
- Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2005). Toward Critical Media Literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300500200169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.