Cited by 61Evaluation of Teaching PracticesBehavioral and Psychological StudiesHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

Evaluating the Temporal Location of Feedback: Providing Feedback Following Performance vs. Prior to Performance

Aljadeff-Abergel, Elian, Peterson, Stephanie M., Wiskirchen, Rebecca R., Hagen, Kristin K., Cole, Mariah L.·2017·Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

Abstract

In order to make feedback as effective as possible, it is important to understand its function in the three-term contingency (TTC) and the impact of various factors involved in delivering feedback. Timing of feedback is one factor that can affect the impact of feedback on learner’s behavior. An analysis of timing of feeback may help us getting closer to better understanding how feedback functions in the TTC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of feedback at different temporal locations. Specifically, feedback was provided either immediately (a) after a teaching session or (b) before the following teaching session, on teaching performance of undergraduate psychology students. The results indicated that feedback provided before the teaching session was more effective in improving teaching skills than feedback that was provided after the session. These findings suggest that feedback may function primarily as an antecedent to future performance and not necessarily as a consequence for past performance. However, the behavioral mechanism that explains these results is not yet clear. Future studies should investigate this further by manipulating the content of feedback prior to the teaching performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01608061.2017.1309332

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aljadeff-Abergel, E., Peterson, S. M., Wiskirchen, R. R., Hagen, K. K., & Cole, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
  • Western Michigan University (US)
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
171-195
ISSN
  • 0160-8061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8604
OpenAlex
W2613000226
Cited by
61
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
16.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
Western Michigan University (Student research grant - no #)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Keywords
feedback timing, three-term contingency, teaching performance, undergraduate psychology students, instructor feedback, teaching skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review