Evaluating the Temporal Location of Feedback: Providing Feedback Following Performance vs. Prior to Performance
Abstract
In order to make feedback as effective as possible, it is important to understand its function in the three-term contingency (TTC) and the impact of various factors involved in delivering feedback. Timing of feedback is one factor that can affect the impact of feedback on learner’s behavior. An analysis of timing of feeback may help us getting closer to better understanding how feedback functions in the TTC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of feedback at different temporal locations. Specifically, feedback was provided either immediately (a) after a teaching session or (b) before the following teaching session, on teaching performance of undergraduate psychology students. The results indicated that feedback provided before the teaching session was more effective in improving teaching skills than feedback that was provided after the session. These findings suggest that feedback may function primarily as an antecedent to future performance and not necessarily as a consequence for past performance. However, the behavioral mechanism that explains these results is not yet clear. Future studies should investigate this further by manipulating the content of feedback prior to the teaching performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Findings from Aljadeff-Abergel et al. (2017) indicate that feedback provided before the teaching session was more effective at improving skills than feedback that was provided after the session.
“findings from Aljadeff-Abergel et al. (2017) indicate that feedback provided before the teaching session was more effective at improving skills than feedback that was provided after the session.”
From Training individuals to implement discrete‐trial teaching procedures using behavioral skills training: A scoping review with implications for practice and research (2024) · cites this paper as Aljadeff-Abergel et al., 2017
Feedback delivered immediately before the session is a more effective method of feedback delivery than feedback delivered following the session.
“feedback delivered immediately before the session (as opposed to following the session) is a more effective method of feedback delivery (Aljadeff-Abergel et al., 2017).”
From Training individuals to implement discrete‐trial teaching procedures using behavioral skills training: A scoping review with implications for practice and research (2024) · cites this paper as Aljadeff-Abergel et al., 2017
Cites
MOTIVATING OPERATIONS AND TERMS TO DESCRIBE THEM: SOME FURTHER REFINEMENTS
Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-407 · Cited by 669 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Briggs, A. M., Zohr, S. J., & Harvey, O. B. (2024) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.1024 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback
Simonian, M. J., & Brand, D. (2022) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.911 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aljadeff-Abergel, E., Peterson, S. M., Wiskirchen, R. R., Hagen, K. K., & Cole, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
- Western Michigan University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-04-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-195
- ISSN
- 0160-8061 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8604
- OpenAlex
- W2613000226
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 16.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Organizational Behavior Management (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Western Michigan University (Student research grant - no #)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Keywords
- feedback timing, three-term contingency, teaching performance, undergraduate psychology students, instructor feedback, teaching skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review