Cited by 57Diabetes Management and EducationHealth and Wellbeing ResearchCancer survivorship and care

Self-Efficacy, Depression, and Self-Care Activities in Adult Jordanians with Type 2 Diabetes: The Role of Illness Perception

Al-Amer, Rasmieh, Ramjan, Lucie, Glew, Paul, Randall, Sue, Salamonson, Yenna·2016·Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is reaching epidemic levels worldwide. In a developing country like Jordan, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has reached a prevalence rate of 17.1%. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between self-care activities and: illness perception, depression, social support, religiosity and spiritual coping, and self-efficacy among patients with T2DM. A random sample of 220 patients with T2DM, who attended Jordan University Hospital in Jordan were enrolled. The data were collected through a structured interview and the medical files. The instruments consisted of a sociodemographic and clinical standardised questionnaires: Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, Patients' Health Questionnaire-9; ENRICH Social Support Instrument; Religious and Spiritual Coping Subscale; Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale; and Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities. Bivariate analysis investigated the relationship between variables. Structure Equation Modelling (SEM) was performed to test the proposed conceptual model. The study found that approximately 70% of the respondents suffered some form of depressive symptoms. The SEM showed a direct relationship between self-efficacy and self-care activities (β = 0.40; p < 0.001). Depression was indirectly related to self-care activities through self-efficacy (β = -0.20; p = 0.003); nevertheless, it was directly related to perception of: treatment control, consequences, and emotional representations. Overall, the sequence…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01612840.2016.1208692

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Amer, R., Ramjan, L., Glew, P., Randall, S., & Salamonson, Y.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Ingham Institute (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Al-Amer, Rasmieh
Venue
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2016-08-02
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
744-755
ISSN
  • 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4673
OpenAlex
W2483658309
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-care, self-efficacy, depression, illness perception, social support, religiosity, spiritual coping, Jordanian adults
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Jordan, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Sick Role, Social Support, Health Behavior, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review