Cited by 27School Choice and PerformanceCritical Race Theory in EducationUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unregulated Open Enrollment and Inequitable Access to Schools of Choice

Lenhoff, Sarah Winchell·2020·Peabody Journal of Education

Abstract

In severing the link between residential address and school assignment, school choice policies have the potential to decrease school segregation and increase educational equity. Yet this promise is undermined when school choice creates greater opportunity for those who are already privileged while limiting access to students from historically marginalized groups. This study combines data from a new survey of local open enrollment policies in Metro Detroit, student-level administrative records, and geographic data to critically analyze the local discretion provided in Michigan’s interdistrict school choice policy in relation to the goals of access to schools of choice, desegregation, and educational equity. I found that local school districts implement provisions of state policy in ways that restrict access to Black and economically disadvantaged students while creating pathways of opportunity for others. Districts are incentivized to implement these restrictions because of the inequities built into the state school funding formula and the racialized geography of Metro Detroit that is mechanized in district and county boundaries to restrict access. This study has implications for the regulation of local school choice markets and the role they play in increasing equitable public school opportunities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0161956x.2020.1776072

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1017/S1049096509090283 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s11256-007-0059-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/01619560902810146 · DOI
  4. 10.1086/599779 · DOI
  5. Bergman, P. & McFarlin, I., Jr. (2018). Education for all? A nationwide audit study of schools of choice (Working Paper). New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~psb2101/BergmanMcFarlin_school_choice.pdf · DOI
  6. Berkman M. B., 2005, Ten thousand democracies: Politics and public opinion in America’s school districts
  7. 10.1002/pam.20226 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0038040716635718 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/0268093042000227465 · DOI
  10. 10.3102/0162373710388643 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/20080159 · DOI
  12. Chubb J. E., 1990, Politics, markets, and America’s schools
  13. 10.14507/epaa.v7n1.1999 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/01619560902810187 · DOI
  15. 10.4324/9781351210447-26 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/0895904818807316 · DOI
  17. 10.1108/IJEM-05-2015-0060 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/0895904818807317 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/09518398.2014.916007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Driver J., 2019, The schoolhouse gate: Public education, the supreme court, and the battle for the American mind
  21. 10.1177/0895904815616488 · DOI
  22. 10.2139/ssrn.2738785 · DOI
  23. Feinberg W., 2008, School choice policies and outcomes: Empirical and philosophical perspectives, 10.1515/9780791477717 · DOI
  24. 10.14507/epaa.25.2601 · DOI
  25. 10.14507/epaa.v11n32.2003 · DOI
  26. 10.3102/0013189X17732752 · DOI
  27. Friedman M., 1953, Essays in positive economics
  28. 10.7208/chicago/9780226264189.001.0001 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/09645299700000026 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0895904807310043 · DOI
  31. Glass G. V., 2008, Fertilizers, pills and magnetic strips: The fate of public education in America
  32. 10.3102/0162373717702964 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/02680930801987844 · DOI
  34. Hastings J. S., 2006, Parental preferences and school competition: Evidence from a public school choice program
  35. Holme J. J., 2013, Teachers College Record, 115, 1, 10.1177/016146811311501104 · DOI
  36. Holme J. J., 2018, Striving in common: A regional equity framework for urban schools
  37. Holme J. J., 2016, Teachers College Record, 118, 1, 10.1177/016146811611800303 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/01619560902810120 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/0895904819874756 · DOI
  40. 10.4324/9781351210447-25 · DOI
  41. 10.4038/jnsfsr.v39i3.3624 · DOI
  42. Khalifa M. A., 2016, Teachers College Record, 118, 1, 10.1177/016146811611800307 · DOI
  43. Kiel D., 2016, School integration matters: Research-based strategies to advance equity, 8
  44. 10.3102/01623737024002145 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00058-3 · DOI
  46. Ladner M., 2000, The impact of limited school choice on public school districts
  47. 10.1016/S0278-0984(06)14008-0 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/0895904813518103 · DOI
  49. Lenhoff, S. W., Singer, J., Pogodzinski, B. & Cook, W. (2019). Exiting Detroit for school: Inequitable choice sets and school quality . Retrieved from the Wayne State University website: http://go.wayne.edu/DetEdResearch · DOI
  50. Lewis A. E., 2015, Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools
  51. Mickelson R. A., 2008, School choice and segregation by race, ethnicity, class, and achievement
  52. Mikulecky M. T., 2013, Open enrollment is on the menu–But can you order it?
  53. National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983, A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform
  54. Orfield G., 1997, Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education
  55. 10.1525/california/9780520274730.001.0001 · DOI
  56. Orfield, G. & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality (K-12 Integration and Diversity). Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4xr8z4wb
  57. 10.1080/01596306.2011.562666 · DOI
  58. 10.1080/00131911.2017.1359148 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/0013161X18809343 · DOI
  60. 10.7208/chicago/9780226120355.001.0001 · DOI
  61. 10.1177/000494418502900205 · DOI
  62. Reardon S. F., 2011, Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances, 91
  63. Rothstein R., 2017, The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America
  64. Rubinowitz L. S., 2002, Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia
  65. Saatcioglu A., 2010, Teachers College Record, 112, 1391
  66. 10.1525/sp.2003.50.2.181 · DOI
  67. 10.3102/01623737018001019 · DOI
  68. 10.1177/0013161X14551983 · DOI
  69. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199982981.003.0009 · DOI
  70. 10.1080/01619568809538615 · DOI
  71. 10.1080/15582159.2011.577676 · DOI
  72. 10.3102/0002831217748880 · DOI
  73. 10.1002/pam.21826 · DOI
  74. 10.1086/599782 · DOI
  75. 10.3102/0013189X08318050 · DOI
  76. Wells A. S., 1997, Stepping over the color line: African-American students in white suburban schools
  77. 10.1177/08959048052840 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lenhoff, S. W.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lenhoff, Sarah Winchell
Venue
Peabody Journal of Education
Published
2020-05-26
Volume
95
Issue
3
Pages
248-271
ISSN
  • 0161-956X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7930
OpenAlex
W3042467524
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Peabody Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Keywords
open enrollment, school choice, educational equity, school segregation, Black students, low-income students, racialized geographies, school district boundaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review