The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Components of a Difference Between Two Rates*
Abstract
* Expanded version of a paper read at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association held in Chicago, December 27–30, 1952. The preparation of this manuscript was sponsored jointly by t...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing
Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014 · Cited by 8,046
Chevan, A., & Sutherland, M. (1991) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1991.10475776 · Cited by 1,163
Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference
Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009211805 · Cited by 933
Quantifying Biases in Causal Models: Classical Confounding vs Collider-Stratification Bias
Greenland, S. (2003) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000042804.12056.6c · Cited by 810
Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing
Goodman-Bacon, A. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w25018 · Cited by 757
Metadata
- Authors
- Kitagawa, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1955-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 272
- Pages
- 1168-1194
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1993130654
- Cited by
- 805
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Components of a Difference Between Two Rates*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1955.10501299
- The paper
- Kitagawa, E. M. (1955). Components of a Difference Between Two Rates*. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1955.10501299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
