The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Choosing between Logistic Regression and Discriminant Analysis
Abstract
Classifying an observation into one of several populations is discriminant analysis, or classification. Relating qualitative variables to other variables through a logistic cdf functional form is logistic regression. Estimators generated for one of these problems are often used in the other. If the populations are normal with identical covariance matrices, discriminant analysis estimators are preferred to logistic regression estimators for the discriminant analysis problem. In most discriminant analysis applications, however, at least one variable is qualitative (ruling out multivariate normality). Under nonnormality, we prefer the logistic regression model with maximum likelihood estimators for solving both problems. In this article we summarize the related arguments, and report on our own supportive empirical studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/451461 · Cited by 3,482
An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting
Peng, C.-Y. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220670209598786 · Cited by 2,671
A Clinical Screener for Compulsive Buying
Faber, R. J., & O'Guinn, T. C. (1992) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209315 · Cited by 992
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400227 · Cited by 861
Artificial neural networks in bankruptcy prediction: General framework and cross-validation analysis
Zhang, G., Y. Hu, M., Eddy Patuwo, B., & C. Indro, D. (1999) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00051-4 · Cited by 677
Metadata
- Authors
- Press, S. J., & Wilson, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1978-12
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 364
- Pages
- 699-705
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2125686177
- Cited by
- 1,118
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Choosing between Logistic Regression and Discriminant Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1978.10480080
- The paper
- Press, S. J., & Wilson, S. (1978). Choosing between Logistic Regression and Discriminant Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1978.10480080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.