Cited by 2,671Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyEducational Research and MethodsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting

Peng, Chao-Ying Joanne, Lee, Kuk Lida, Ingersoll, Gary M.·2002·The Journal of Educational Research

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide researchers, editors, and readers with a set of guidelines for what to expect in an article using logistic regression techniques. Tables, figures, and charts that should be included to comprehensively assess the results and assumptions to be verified are discussed. This article demonstrates the preferred pattern for the application of logistic methods with an illustration of logistic regression applied to a data set in testing a research hypothesis. Recommendations are also offered for appropriate reporting formats of logistic regression results and the minimum observation-to-predictor ratio. The authors evaluated the use and interpretation of logistic regression presented in 8 articles published in The Journal of Educational Research between 1990 and 2000. They found that all 8 studies met or exceeded recommended criteria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00220670209598786

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most authors agree on techniques to analyze and express the soundness of LR, including overall model evaluation, statistical tests of individual predictors, goodness-of-fit statistics and validation of predicted probabilities.

    “Most authors agree on the different techniques used to analyze and express the soundness of LR [174, 175, 176, 177], including the overall model evaluation, statistical tests of individual predictors, goodness-of-fit statistics and validation of the predicted probabilities.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, C.-Y. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
The Journal of Educational Research
Published
2002-09
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
3-14
ISSN
  • 0022-0671 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0675
OpenAlex
W2004147962
Cited by
2,671
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 218 · 2024: 236 · 2023: 221 · 2022: 269 · 2021: 257 · 2020: 247 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 102
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
logistic regression, reporting guidelines, reporting quality, model assumptions, educational research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review