Cited by 58Statistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsProbability and Statistical ResearchAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Exact Distribution of Bartlett’s Test Statistic for Homogeneity of Variances with Unequal Sample Sizes

Chao, Min-Te, Glaser, Ronald E.·1978·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

An expression is derived for the null density of the Bartlett test statistic for testing equality of variances of n normal populations, when random samples not necessarily of the same size are taken. The expression permits computation of exact Bartlett critical values. As a generalization, an expression is derived for the density of the normalized ratio of an arbitrarily weighted geometric mean to the unweighted arithmetic mean, based on a sample of n independently distributed gamma random variables having common scale parameter but different shape parameters.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1978.10481594

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values for behavioral intention, tourism motivation, and perceived value were 0.905, 0.869, and 0.919, respectively, and Bartlett's tests were significant (p < 0.001).

    “The results showed that the KMO values of behavioral intention, tourism motivation, and perceived value were 0.905, 0.869, and 0.919, respectively, while the approximate square card of behavioral intention, tourism motivation, and perceived value were 3057.033 (df = 66, p < 0.001), 3782.221 (df = 136, p < 0.001), and 1581.617(df = 15, p < 0.001), respectively.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Barnes E. W., 1899, Messenger of Mathematics, 29, 64
  2. Hardy G. H., 1952, Inequalities

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chao, M.-T., & Glaser, R. E.
Affiliations
  • AT&T (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1978-06
Volume
73
Issue
362
Pages
422-426
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2084614649
Cited by
58
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
Bartlett test, homoscedasticity, unequal sample sizes, exact distribution, critical values, healthy population, weighted geometric mean, gamma random variables, ratio of means

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review