The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Suppression Methodology and Statistical Disclosure Control
Abstract
This article discusses theory and method of complementary cell suppression and related topics in statistical disclosure control. Emphasis is placed on the development of methods that are theoretically broad but also practical to implement. The approach draws from areas of discrete mathematics and linear optimization theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
L -diversity: Privacy beyond k -anonymity
Machanavajjhala, A., Kifer, D., Gehrke, J., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/1217299.1217302 · Cited by 3,617
Privacy-preserving data mining
Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (2000) · Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/342009.335438 · Cited by 1,719
Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S. (2010) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1749603.1749605 · Cited by 1,704
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, L. H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1980-06
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 370
- Pages
- 377-385
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2023401109
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suppression Methodology and Statistical Disclosure Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1980.10477481
- The paper
- Cox, L. H. (1980). Suppression Methodology and Statistical Disclosure Control. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1980.10477481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
