Cited by 626Time Series Analysis and ForecastingStatistical and numerical algorithmsStatistical Methods and Applications

Modeling Multiple Time Series with Applications

Tiao, G. C., Box, G. E. P.·1981·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

An approach to the modeling and analysis of multiple time series is proposed. Properties of a class of vector autoregressive moving average models are discussed. Modeling procedures consisting of tentative specification, estimation, and diagnostic checking are outlined and illustrated by three real examples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1981.10477728

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiao, G. C., & Box, G. E. P.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin System (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1981-12
Volume
76
Issue
376
Pages
802-816
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2026181456
Cited by
626
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
31.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
multiple time series, vector autoregressive moving average models, VARMA models, model specification, model estimation, diagnostic checking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review