Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,614

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Method for Comparing Two Hierarchical Clusterings

Fowlkes, E. B., Mallows, C. L.·1983·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

This article concerns the derivation and use of a measure of similarity between two hierarchical clusterings. The measure, Bk , is derived from the matching matrix, [mij ], formed by cutting the two hierarchical trees and counting the number of matching entries in the k clusters in each tree. The mean and variance of Bk are determined under the assumption that the margins of [mij ] are fixed. Thus, Bk represents a collection of measures for k = 2, …, n – 1. (k, Bk ) plots are found to be useful in portraying the similarity of two clusterings. Bk is compared to other measures of similarity proposed respectively by Baker (1974) and Rand (1971). The use of (k, Bk ) plots for studying clustering methods is explored by a series of Monte Carlo sampling experiments. An example of the use of (k, Bk ) on real data is given.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1983.10478008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,614

Metadata

Authors
Fowlkes, E. B., & Mallows, C. L.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1983-09
Volume
78
Issue
383
Pages
553-569
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2030644393
Cited by
1,614
References
0
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Method for Comparing Two Hierarchical Clusterings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1983.10478008
The paper
Fowlkes, E. B., & Mallows, C. L. (1983). A Method for Comparing Two Hierarchical Clusterings. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1983.10478008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.