Cited by 1,263Data Visualization and AnalyticsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature*

Vessey, Iris·1991·Decision Sciences

Abstract

A considerable amount of research has been conducted over a long period of time into the effects of graphical and tabular representations on decision‐making performance. To date, however, the literature appears to have arrived at few conclusions with regard to the performance of the two representations. This paper addresses these issues by presenting a theory, based on information processing theory, to explain under what circumstances one representation outperforms the other. The fundamental aspects of the theory are: (1) although graphical and tabular representations may contain the same information, they present that information in fundamentally different ways; graphical representations emphasize spatial information, while tables emphasize symbolic information; (2) tasks can be divided into two types, spatial and symbolic, based on the type of information that facilitates their solution; (3) performance on a task will be enhanced when there is a cognitive fit (match) between the information emphasized in the representation type and that required by the task type; that is, when graphs support spatial tasks and when tables support symbolic tasks; (4) the processes or strategies problem solvers use are the crucial elements of cognitive fit since they provide the link between representation and task; the processes identified here are perceptual and analytical; (5) so long as there is a complete fit of representation, processes, and task type, each representation will lead to both quicker and more accurate problem solving. The theory is validated by its success in explaining the results of published studies that examine the performance of graphical and tabular representations in decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive fit theory suggests that the alignment between an individual's cognitive processes and the representation of information by technology influences the effectiveness of problem solving and decision-making.

    “Cognitive fit theory complements this relationship by suggesting that the alignment between an individual’s cognitive processes and the representation of information by technology influences the effectiveness of problem solving and decision-making [18].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vessey, I.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Vessey, Iris
Venue
Decision Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-03
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
219-240
ISSN
  • 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5915
OpenAlex
W2123334556
Cited by
1,263
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 67
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Decision Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
cognitive fit, graphical representation, tabular representation, decision-making, information processing theory, geospatial data, symbolic information, problem-solving strategies, perceptual processing, analytical processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review