The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Agreement among Raters
Abstract
An approach to the modeling of agreement among raters is proposed. By examining a hierarchy of log-linear models, it is shown how one can analyze the agreement among the raters in a manner analogous to the analysis of association in a contingency table. Specific attention is given to the problems of the K-rater agreement and the agreement between several observers and a standard. Examples are used to illustrate how this approach provides a general framework for modeling agreement in a variety of problem situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031619 · Cited by 8,733
Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives.
Light, R. J. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031643 · Cited by 747
Cited by
Beyond kappa: a review of interrater agreement measures
Banerjee, M., Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L., & Sinha, D. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/3315487 · Cited by 976
Clogg, C. C. (1995) · Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1292-3_6 · Cited by 621
Kappa coefficients in medical research
Chmura Kraemer, H., Periyakoil, V. S., & Noda, A. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1180 · Cited by 527
Diversity of decision-making models and the measurement of interrater agreement
Uebersax, J. S. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.140 · Cited by 254
Sartorius, N. (1993) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820140037004 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanner, M. A., & Young, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1985-03
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 389
- Pages
- 175-180
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1984157647
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling Agreement among Raters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1985.10477157
- The paper
- Tanner, M. A., & Young, M. A. (1985). Modeling Agreement among Raters. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1985.10477157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
