Cited by 750Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementPsychometric Methodologies and TestingSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives.

Light, Richard J.·1971·Psychological Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0031643

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Light, R. J.
Affiliations
Howard University (US)
Corresponding author
Light, Richard J.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1971-11
Volume
76
Issue
5
Pages
365-377
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W1989492805
Cited by
747
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
interobserver agreement, qualitative data, categorical data, agreement measures, inter-rater reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review