Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression

Gong, Gail·1986·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Given a prediction rule based on a set of patients, what is the probability of incorrectly predicting the outcome of a new patient? Call this probability the true error. An optimistic estimate is the apparent error, or the proportion of incorrect predictions on the original set of patients, and it is the goal of this article to study estimates of the excess error, or the difference between the true and apparent errors. I consider three estimates of the excess error: cross-validation, the jackknife, and the bootstrap. Using simulations and real data, the three estimates for a specific prediction rule are compared. When the prediction rule is allowed to be complicated, overfitting becomes a real danger, and excess error estimation becomes important. The prediction rule chosen here is moderately complicated, involving a variable-selection procedure based on forward logistic regression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478245

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Gong, G.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1986-03
Volume
81
Issue
393
Pages
108-113
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2041208063
Cited by
243
References
2
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478245
The paper
Gong, G. (1986). Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478245

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.