The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression
Abstract
Given a prediction rule based on a set of patients, what is the probability of incorrectly predicting the outcome of a new patient? Call this probability the true error. An optimistic estimate is the apparent error, or the proportion of incorrect predictions on the original set of patients, and it is the goal of this article to study estimates of the excess error, or the difference between the true and apparent errors. I consider three estimates of the excess error: cross-validation, the jackknife, and the bootstrap. Using simulations and real data, the three estimates for a specific prediction rule are compared. When the prediction rule is allowed to be complicated, overfitting becomes a real danger, and excess error estimation becomes important. The prediction rule chosen here is moderately complicated, involving a variable-selection procedure based on forward logistic regression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications
Geisser, S. (1975) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865 · Cited by 2,748
Cited by
Boersma, E., Pieper, K. S., Steyerberg, E. W., Wilcox, R. G., Chang, W.-C., Lee, K. L., Akkerhuis, K. M., Harrington, R. A., Deckers, J. W., Armstrong, P. W., et al. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.22.2557 · Cited by 963
Predictive value of statistical models.
Van Houwelingen, J. C., & Le Cessie, S. (1990) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780091109 · Cited by 621
On the Impact of Variable Selection in Fitting Regression Equations
Freedman, D. A., Navidi, W., & Peters, S. C. (1988) · Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61564-1_1 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Gong, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 393
- Pages
- 108-113
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2041208063
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478245
- The paper
- Gong, G. (1986). Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.