Cited by 621Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyStatistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods and Applications

Predictive value of statistical models.

Van Houwelingen, J. C., Le Cessie, S.·1990·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

A review is given of different ways of estimating the error rate of a prediction rule based on a statistical model. A distinction is drawn between apparent, optimum and actual error rates. Moreover it is shown how cross-validation can be used to obtain an adjusted predictor with smaller error rate. A detailed discussion is given for ordinary least squares, logistic regression and Cox regression in survival analysis. Finally, the splitsample approach is discussed and demonstrated on two data sets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.4780091109

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overfitting is even more likely when the number of candidate predictors is large relative to the effective sample size.

    “Overfitting is even more likely when the number of candidate predictors is large relative to the effective sample size [10],[12],[70].”
  • Apparent model performance is generally too optimistic, as the model has been tailored to the dataset at hand.

    “This apparent model performance, however, is generally too optimistic, as the model has been tailored to the dataset at hand.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Houwelingen, J. C., & Le Cessie, S.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-11
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
1303-1325
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W650692540
Cited by
621
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 29
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Quality Engineering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
prediction error estimation, statistical models, cross-validation, ordinary least squares, logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards model, survival analysis
MeSH terms
Calibration, Female, Graft Survival, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Regression Analysis, Models, Statistical, Least-Squares Analysis, Survival Analysis, Kidney Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review