The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance of Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling
Abstract
The techniques of exploratory data analysis include a resistant rule for identifying possible outliers in univariate data. Using the lower and upper fourths, FL and FU (approximate quartiles), it labels as “outside” any observations below FL − 1.5(FU — FL ) or above FU + 1.5(FU — FL ). For example, in the ordered sample −5, −2, 0, 1, 8, FL = −2 and FU = 1, so any observation below −6.5 or above 5.5 is outside. Thus the rule labels 8 as outside. Some related rules also use cutoffs of the form FL — k(FU — FL ) and FU + k(FU — FL ). This approach avoids the need to specify the number of possible outliers in advance; as long as they are not too numerous, any outliers do not affect the location of the cutoffs. To describe the performance of these rules, we define the some-outside rate per sample as the probability that a sample will contain one or more outside observations. Its complement is the all-inside rate per sample. We also define the outside rate per observation as the average fraction of outside observations. For Gaussian data the population all-inside rate per sample (0) and the population outside rate per observation (.7%) substantially understate the corresponding small-sample values. Simulation studies using Gaussian samples with n between 5 and 300 yield detailed information on the resistant rules. The main resistant rule (k = 1.5) has an all-inside rate per sample between 67% and 86% for 5 ≤n ≤ 20, and corresponding estimates of its outside rate per observation range from 8.6% to 1.7%. Both characteristics vary with n in ways that lead to good empirical approximations. Because of the way in which the fourths are defined, the sample sizes separate into four classes, according to whether dividing n by 4 leaves a remainder of 0, 1, 2, or 3. Within these four classes the all-inside rate per sample shows a roughly linear decrease with n over the range 9 ≤ n ≤ 50, and the outside rate per observation decreases linearly in 1/n for n ≥ 9. A more theoretical approximation for the all-inside rate per sample works with the order statistics X (1) ≤ … ≤ X (n). In this notation the fourths are X(f) and X (n + 1 — f) with f = ½[(n + 3)/2], where [·] is the greatest-integer function. A sample has no observations outside whenever {X(f)−X(1)}/{X(n+1-f)−X(f)}≤k and {X(n)−X(n+1-f)}/{X(n+1-f)−X(f)}≤k. We first approximate the numerators and denominator in these ratios by constant multiples of chi-squared random variables with the same mean and variance. We then approximate the logarithm of each ratio by a Gaussian random variable, and we calculate the correlation between these variables from the fact that the ratios have the same denominator. Finally, a bivariate Gaussian probability calculation yields the approximate all-inside rate per sample. The error of the result relative to the simulation estimate is typically from 1% to 2% for 5 ≤ n ≤ 50. To provide an indication of how the two rates behave in alternative “null” situations, the simulation studies included samples from five heavier-tailed members of the family of h distributions. For a given sample size, the all-inside rate per sample decreases as the tails become heavier, and the outside rate per observation increases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Data were screened for errors, missing values, and outliers using the interquartile rule (Hoaglin et al., 1986) on SPSS 27 (IBM, Armonk, NY), with whisker and box plots.”
From Testing Mindfulness Mechanisms of Action on the Stress and Burnout of Social Workers (2024) · cites this paper as Hoaglin et al., 1986
Citations
Cites
Simultaneous Statistical Inference
Miller, R. G. (1981) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8122-8 · Cited by 5,608
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Pyke, R. (1965) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1965.tb00602.x · Cited by 477
The Statistical Analysis of Variance-Heterogeneity and the Logarithmic Transformation
Bartlett, M. S., & Kendall, D. G. (1946) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.2307/2983618 · Cited by 470
Some Grubbs-Type Statistics for the Detection of Several Outliers
Tietjen, G. L., & Moore, R. H. (1972) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1972.10488948 · Cited by 290
Algorithm AS 103: Psi (Digamma) Function
Bernardo, J. M. (1976) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.2307/2347257 · Cited by 168
Beckman, R. J., & Cook, R. D. (1983) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1268541 · Cited by 152
Some properties of the tukey g and h family of distributions
Martínez, J., & Iglewicz, B. (1984) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610928408828687 · Cited by 148
Self-citationAlgorithm AS 121: Trigamma Function
Schneider, B. E. (1978) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.2307/2346249 · Cited by 63
Critical Values for a Sequential Test for Many Outliers
Prescott, P. (1979) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.2307/2346808 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Barnett Vic, 1978, Outliers in Statistical Data
- Barnett Vic, 1984, Outliers in Statistical Data,
- DiDonato A. R., 1978, “Computation of the Bivariate Normal Distribution Over Convex Polygons”
- Donoho David L., 1983, A Festschrift for Erich L. Lehmann, 157
- Emerson John D., 1983, Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis, 58
- Hoaglin David C., 1983, Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis, 33
- Hoaglin David C., 1985, Exploring Data Tables, Trends, and Shapes, 461
- Ingelfinger Joseph A., 1983, Biostatistics in Clinical Medicine
- McNeil Donald R., 1977, Interactive Data Analysis
- Tietjen G. L., 1977, Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics, 5, 1
- Tukey John W., 1970, Exploratory Data Analysis, 1
- Tukey John W., 1977, Exploratory Data Analysis
- Tukey, John W. “Modern Techniques in Data Analysis”. regional research conference sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Southeastern Massachusetts University, North Dartmouth.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Livingstone, S. R., & Russo, F. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196391 · Cited by 2,084
Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling
Hoaglin, D. C., & Iglewicz, B. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1987.10478551 · Cited by 1,211
Self-citationCook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 · Cited by 971
Some Implementations of the Boxplot
Frigge, M. L., Hoaglin, D. C., & Iglewicz, B. (1989) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1989.10475612 · Cited by 735
Self-citationComputing and Graphing Highest Density Regions
Hyndman, R. J. (1996) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1996.10474359 · Cited by 774
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoaglin, D. C., Iglewicz, B., & Tukey, J. W.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- ORCID
- Hoaglin, David C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 396
- Pages
- 991-999
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1993723434
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- outlier detection, quartiles, small sample properties, Gaussian data, order statistics, cut-off values, exploratory data analysis, simulation study, sample size dependence, univariate data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review