Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 766

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probabilistic Solution of Ill-Posed Problems in Computational Vision

Open access
Marroquin, J., Mitter, S., Poggio, T.·1987·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Computational vision is a set of inverse problems. We review standard regularization theory, discuss its limitations, and present new stochastic (in particular, Bayesian) methods for their solution. We derive efficient algorithms and describe parallel implementations on digital parallel SIMD architectures, as well as a new class of parallel hybrid computers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478393

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 766

Metadata

Authors
Marroquin, J., Mitter, S., & Poggio, T.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1987-03
Volume
82
Issue
397
Pages
76-89
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2019635781
Cited by
766
References
1
FWCI
37.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic Solution of Ill-Posed Problems in Computational Vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478393
The paper
Marroquin, J., Mitter, S., & Poggio, T. (1987). Probabilistic Solution of Ill-Posed Problems in Computational Vision. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478393

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.