The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Exact Test for Multiple Inequality and Equality Constraints in the Linear Regression Model
Abstract
In this article we consider the linear regression model y = Xβ + ε, where ε is N(0, σ2I). In this context we derive exact tests of the form H: Rβ ≥ r versus K: β ∈ RK for the case in which θ2 is unknown. We extend these results to consider hypothesis tests of the form H: R1β ≥ r1 and R2β = r2 versus K: (β ∈ RK . For each of these hypotheses tests we derive several equivalent forms of the test statistics using the duality theory of the quadratic programming. For both tests we derive their exact distribution as a weighted sum of Snedecor's F distributions normalized by the numerator degrees of freedom of each F distribution of the sum. A methodology for computing critical values as well as probability values for the tests is discussed. The relationship between this testing framework and the multivariate one-sided hypothesis testing literature is also discussed. In this context we show that for any size of the hypothesis test H: λ = 0 versus K: β ∈ RK the test statistic and critical value obtained are the same as those from the hypothesis test H: λ = 0 versus K: λ ≥ 0, where λ is the expectation of the Lagrange multiplier arising from the estimation of β subject to the equality constraints Rβ = r. In this way we link the multivariate inequality constraints test to the much studied multivariate one-sided hypothesis test, H: μ = 0 versus K: μ ≥ 0, where μ is the mean of a multivariate normal random vector. We also show that the test H: R 1β ≥ r 1 and R 2β = r 2 versus K: β ∈ RK has the following equivalent test in terms of λ, H: λ = 0 versus K: λ1 ≥ 0, and λ2 ≠ 0, where λ1 is the subvector of λ corresponding to R1β ≥ r1 and λ2 corresponds to R 2β = r 2. Extensions of recent work in one-sided hypothesis testing for the coefficients of the linear regression model are also derived. For the normal linear regression model we derive exact tests for the hypothesis testing problems H: Rβ = r versus K: Rβ ≥ r and H: Rβ = r versus K: R 1β ≥ r, and R 2β ≠ r 2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Test for Superior Predictive Ability
Hansen, P. R. (2005) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/073500105000000063 · Cited by 1,230
Now-Casting and the Real-Time Data Flow
Bańbura, M., Giannone, D., Modugno, M., & Reichlin, L. (2013) · Handbook of Economic Forecasting · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53683-9.00004-9 · Cited by 448
How the Allocation of Children’s Time Affects Cognitive and Noncognitive Development
Fiorini, M., & Keane, M. P. (2014) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/677232 · Cited by 358
Constrained Optimization Approaches to Estimation of Structural Models
(2012) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta7925 · Cited by 365
Pricing Model Performance and the Two‐Pass Cross‐Sectional Regression Methodology
KAN, R., ROBOTTI, C., & SHANKEN, J. (2013) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12035 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolak, F. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 399
- Pages
- 782-793
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2144796600
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Exact Test for Multiple Inequality and Equality Constraints in the Linear Regression Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478499
- The paper
- Wolak, F. A. (1987). An Exact Test for Multiple Inequality and Equality Constraints in the Linear Regression Model. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.