The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative Transformations to Handle Extreme Values of the Dependent Variable
Abstract
Transformations that could be used to reduce the influence of extreme observations of dependent variables, which can assume either sign, on regression coefficient estimates are studied in this article. Two that seem reasonable on a priori grounds—the extended Box—Cox (BC) and the inverse hyperbolic sine (IHS)—are evaluated in detail. One feature is that the log-likelihood function for IHS is defined for zero values of the dependent variable, which is not true of BC. The double-length regression technique (Davidson and MacKinnon 1984) is used to perform hypothesis tests of one transformation against the other using Canadian data on household net worth. These tests support the use of IHS instead of BC for this data set. Empirical investigators in economics often work with a logged dependent variable (taking the natural logarithm of a data series is, of course, a special case of BC) to reduce the weight their particular estimation procedure might otherwise attach to extreme values of the dependent variable. Logging dependent and independent variables has the added attraction that slope coefficients may be interpreted as elasticities. In the event that the dependent variable assumes nonpositive values, some researchers (e.g., Diamond and Hausman 1984; King and Dicks-Mireaux 1982) have dropped the nonpositive values and others have added a constant so that each observation is positive. An alternative transformation, which is defined for any real number, is the IHS transformation, sinh-1(x) = log(x + (x 2 + l)1/2). This was proposed in Johnson (1949) and is just as easy to employ as the BC transformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Cited by
Arcand, J. L., Berkes, E., & Panizza, U. (2015) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1007/s10887-015-9115-2 · Cited by 1,136
Fear, lockdown, and diversion: Comparing drivers of pandemic economic decline 2020
Goolsbee, A., & Syverson, C. (2021) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104311 · Cited by 749
Chen, M. K. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.2.690 · Cited by 745
Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing
Himmelstein, D. S., Lizee, A., Hessler, C., Brueggeman, L., Chen, S. L., Hadley, D., Green, A., Khankhanian, P., & Baranzini, S. E. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.26726 · Cited by 666
Lee, S., Viqar, F., Zimmerman, M. E., Narkhede, A., Tosto, G., Benzinger, T. L. S., Marcus, D. S., Fagan, A. M., Goate, A., Fox, N. C., et al. (2016) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24647 · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- Burbidge, J. B., Magee, L., & Robb, A. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-03
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 401
- Pages
- 123-127
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2012734657
- Cited by
- 1,414
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative Transformations to Handle Extreme Values of the Dependent Variable. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478575
- The paper
- Burbidge, J. B., Magee, L., & Robb, A. L. (1988). Alternative Transformations to Handle Extreme Values of the Dependent Variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.