The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resampling Inference with Complex Survey Data
Abstract
Methods for standard errors and confidence intervals for nonlinear statistics —such as ratios, regression, and correlation coefficients—have been extensively studied for stratified multistage designs in which the clusters are sampled with replacement, in particular, the important special case of two sampled clusters per stratum. These methods include the customary linearization (or Taylor) method and resampling methods based on the jackknife and balanced repeated replication (BRR). Unlike the jackknife or the BRR, the linearization method is applicable to general sampling designs, but it involves a separate variance formula for each nonlinear statistic, thereby requiring additional programming efforts. Both the jackknife and the BRR use a single variance formula for all nonlinear statistics, but they are more computing-intensive. The resampling methods developed here retain these features of the jackknife and the BRR, yet permit extension to more complex designs involving sampling without replacement. The sampling designs studied include (a) stratified cluster sampling in which the clusters are sampled with replacement, (b) stratified simple random sampling without replacement, (c) unequal probability sampling without replacement, and (d) two-stage cluster sampling with equal probabilities and without replacement. Our proposed resampling methods may be viewed as extensions to complex survey samples of the bootstrap, and in the case of design (c), of the BRR as well. We obtain and study the properties of variance estimators of and confidence intervals for the parameter of interest θ, based on the bootstrap histogram of the t statistic. The variance estimators reduce to the standard ones in the special case of linear statistics. These confidence intervals take account of the skewness in the distribution of , unlike the intervals based on the normal approximation. For case (a), the sampled clusters are resampled in each stratum independently by simple random sampling with replacement, and this procedure is replicated many times. The estimate for each resampled cluster is properly scaled such that the resulting variance estimator of reduces to the standard unbiased variance estimator in the linear case. For case (b), the sampled units are resampled in each stratum as in case (a), but a different scaling is used. Different resampling procedures and scalings are employed for case (c). A two-stage resampling procedure is developed for case (d). Results of a simulation study under a stratified simple random sampling design show that the bootstrap intervals track the nominal error rate in each tail better than the intervals based on the normal approximation, but the bootstrap variance estimators are less stable than those based on the linearization or the jackknife.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Cited by
The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy
Deaton, A. (1997) · doi:10.1596/0-8018-5254-4 · Cited by 4,877
Increased Prevalence of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Adults
Peppard, P. E., Young, T., Barnet, J. H., Palta, M., Hagen, E. W., & Hla, K. M. (2013) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kws342 · Cited by 4,618
Complex Sample Data in Structural Equation Modeling
Muthen, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/271070 · Cited by 1,586
Chen, Y. (2002) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/155.3.191 · Cited by 406
Inference for Nonprobability Samples
Elliott, M. R., & Valliant, R. (2017) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/16-sts598 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, J. N. K., & Wu, C. F. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-03
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 401
- Pages
- 231-241
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2094031870
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resampling Inference with Complex Survey Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478591
- The paper
- Rao, J. N. K., & Wu, C. F. J. (1988). Resampling Inference with Complex Survey Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.