The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Nonparametric Method for Dealing with Mismeasured Covariate Data
Abstract
Mismeasurement of covariate data is a frequent problem in statistical data analysis. However, when true and mismeasured data are obtained for a subsample of the observations, it is possible to estimate the parameters relating the outcome to the covariate of interest. Maximum likelihood methods that rely on parametric models for the mismeasurement have not met with much success. Realistic models for the mismeasurement process are difficult to construct; the form of the likelihood is often intractable and, more important, such methods are not robust to model misspecification. We propose an easily implemented method that is nonparametric with respect to the mismeasurement process and that is applicable when mismeasurement is due to the problem of missing data, errors in variables, or use of imperfect surrogate covariates. Specifically, denote the outcome variable by Y, the covariate data subject to mismeasurement by X, and the remaining covariates, including perhaps surrogates or mismeasured values of X, by Z. We consider a general regression model of the form Pβ (Y | X, Z). Suppose data regarding Y, X, and Z are available for a validation sample V , a random subsample of the total sample, whereas data regarding only Y and Z are available for the remainder, the nonvalidation sample V . We propose to base inference on the estimated likelihood for β, [Lcirc](β) = Π i∈v P β (Yi | X i , Z i ) Π j∈ v [Pcirc] β (Y j | Z j ), where [Pcirc] β(Y j | Z j ) is estimated empirically using the validation sample covariate data. Asymptotic results are derived for the case in which the surrogate or mismeasured covariates are categorical. The asymptotic variance of the estimated score involves not only the second derivative of the log estimated likelihood but also a term that captures the variability induced by estimating the nonvalidation sample likelihood. An example and a small simulation study demonstrate that this method may be of value for the missing covariate data and covariate measurement error problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
Andersen, P. K., & Gill, R. D. (1982) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176345976 · Cited by 4,419
Cox, D. R., & Hinkley, D. V. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2887-0 · Cited by 3,089
Metadata
- Authors
- Pepe, M. S., & Fleming, T. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 413
- Pages
- 108-113
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2027119131
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Nonparametric Method for Dealing with Mismeasured Covariate Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1991.10475009
- The paper
- Pepe, M. S., & Fleming, T. R. (1991). A Nonparametric Method for Dealing with Mismeasured Covariate Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1991.10475009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.