Cited by 3,089Probability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods and ApplicationsStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

Theoretical Statistics

Cox, D. R., Hinkley, D. V.·1974·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-2887-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In this paper, for all experiments, the confidence interval is lower than 0.5%, so any difference higher than 0.5% is significant with 95% probability.

    “In this paper, for all the experiments, the confidence interval is lower than 0.5%, so any difference higher than this value, this difference can be considered as significant with a 95% a probability.”

    From Feature extraction for robust physical activity recognition (2017) · cites this paper as [29]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, D. R., & Hinkley, D. V.
Venue
Springer eBooks
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1974
OpenAlex
W4240874411
Cited by
3,089
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 153 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 101
FWCI
7.91
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Keywords
mathematical statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review