Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data

Albert, James H., Chib, Siddhartha·1993·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

A vast literature in statistics, biometrics, and econometrics is concerned with the analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. The classical approach fits a categorical response regression model using maximum likelihood, and inferences about the model are based on the associated asymptotic theory. The accuracy of classical confidence statements is questionable for small sample sizes. In this article, exact Bayesian methods for modeling categorical response data are developed using the idea of data augmentation. The general approach can be summarized as follows. The probit regression model for binary outcomes is seen to have an underlying normal regression structure on latent continuous data. Values of the latent data can be simulated from suitable truncated normal distributions. If the latent data are known, then the posterior distribution of the parameters can be computed using standard results for normal linear models. Draws from this posterior are used to sample new latent data, and the process is iterated with Gibbs sampling. This data augmentation approach provides a general framework for analyzing binary regression models. It leads to the same simplification achieved earlier for censored regression models. Under the proposed framework, the class of probit regression models can be enlarged by using mixtures of normal distributions to model the latent data. In this normal mixture class, one can investigate the sensitivity of the parameter estimates to the choice of “link function,” which relates the linear regression estimate to the fitted probabilities. In addition, this approach allows one to easily fit Bayesian hierarchical models. One specific model considered here reflects the belief that the vector of regression coefficients lies on a smaller dimension linear subspace. The methods can also be generalized to multinomial response models with J > 2 categories. In the ordered multinomial model, the J categories are ordered and a model is written linking the cumulative response probabilities with the linear regression structure. In the unordered multinomial model, the latent variables have a multivariate normal distribution with unknown variance-covariance matrix. For both multinomial models, the data augmentation method combined with Gibbs sampling is outlined. This approach is especially attractive for the multivariate probit model, where calculating the likelihood can be difficult.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1993.10476321

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1093/biomet/57.2.253 · DOI
  2. Aitchison J., 1957, Biometrika, 44, 131, 10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.131 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Amemiya T., 1985, Advanced Econometrics
  4. 10.1007/978-1-4419-8724-2 · DOI
  5. Carlin B. P., 1991, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 4, 399, 10.2307/3315430 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/biomet/75.4.651 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90030-U · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cox D. R., 1971, The Analysis of Binary Data
  9. Daganzo C., 1979, Multinomial Probit
  10. Dellaportas P., Applied Statistics
  11. Devroye L., 1986, Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, 10.1007/978-1-4613-8643-8 · DOI
  12. Finney D. J., 1947, Biometrika, 34, 320, 10.1093/biomet/34.3-4.320 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/2289594 · DOI
  14. Geweke, J. “Efficient Simulation From the Multivariate Normal and Student-T Distributions Subject to Linear Constraints. Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Symposium on the Interface. pp.571–578. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
  15. Greene W. H., 1990, Econometric Analysis
  16. 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478519 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/2527689 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/1913909 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lee P. M., 1989, Bayesian Statistics
  20. Lindley D. V., 1972, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 135, 370, 10.2307/2344614 · DOI
  21. Maddala G. S., 1983, Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, 10.1017/CBO9780511810176 · DOI · Paper page
  22. McCullagh P., 1980, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 109
  23. McCulloch R., 1991, A Bayesian Analysis of the Multinomial Probit Model
  24. McFadden D., 1974, Frontiers of Econometrics, 105
  25. 10.1080/0022250X.1975.9989847 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/biomet/65.3.667 · DOI
  27. Myers R. H., 1990, Classical and Modern Regression With Applications
  28. 10.2307/2347995 · DOI
  29. Nelder J. A., 1989, Generalized Linear Models
  30. 10.2307/2529262 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478458 · DOI
  32. Wei G. C. G., 1990, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 829, 10.2307/2290022 · DOI
  33. West, M. “Modeling With Heavy Tails,”. Proceedings of the 4th Valencia Meeting on Bayesian Statistics.
  34. 10.1080/01621459.1991.10475006 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1080/01621459.1975.10480274 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0304-4076(84)90007-1 · DOI

Cited by

See all 3,167

Metadata

Authors
Albert, J. H., & Chib, S.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1993-06
Volume
88
Issue
422
Pages
669-679
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2108306139
Cited by
3,167
References
2
FWCI
23.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476321
The paper
Albert, J. H., & Chib, S. (1993). Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476321

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.