The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Procedures for the Identification of Multiple Outliers in Linear Models
Abstract
We consider the problem of identifying and testing multiple outliers in linear models. The available outlier identification methods often do not succeed in detecting multiple outliers because they are affected by the observations they are supposed to identify. We introduce two test procedures for the detection of multiple outliers that appear to be less sensitive to this problem. Both procedures attempt to separate the data into a set of “clean” data points and a set of points that contain the potential outliers. The potential outliers are then tested to see how extreme they are relative to the clean subset, using an appropriately scaled version of the prediction error. The procedures are illustrated and compared to various existing methods, using several data sets known to contain multiple outliers. Also, the performances of both procedures are investigated by a Monte Carlo study. The data sets and the Monte Carlo indicate that both procedures are effective in the detection of multiple outliers in linear models and are superior to other methods, including methods based on robust fits (e.g., least median of squares residuals). In particular, the methods do not require presetting numbers of outliers to test for, do not require the efficiency level of an estimator, do not require Monte Carlo to determine cutoff values, are not highly computationally intensive, and are relatively resistant to both masking and swamping effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316801 · Cited by 7,344
Robust Regression and Outlier Detection
Rousseeuw, P. J., & Leroy, A. M. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725382 · Cited by 5,609
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Cited by
Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis.
Behrens, J. T. (1997) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.2.2.131 · Cited by 465
Robust estimator for correlated observations based on bifactor equivalent weights
Yang, Y., Song, L., & Xu, T. (2002) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0256-7 · Cited by 349
Outlier Detection Using Nonconvex Penalized Regression
She, Y., & Owen, A. B. (2011) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10390 · Cited by 310
Fast Very Robust Methods for the Detection of Multiple Outliers
Atkinson, A. C. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476872 · Cited by 269
McClay, J. L., Adkins, D. E., Åberg, K., Bukszár, J., Khachane, A. N., Keefe, R. S. E., Perkins, D. O., McEvoy, J. P., Stroup, T. S., Vann, R. E., et al. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.193 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Hadi, A. S., & Simonoff, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 424
- Pages
- 1264-1272
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2012836768
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Procedures for the Identification of Multiple Outliers in Linear Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476407
- The paper
- Hadi, A. S., & Simonoff, J. S. (1993). Procedures for the Identification of Multiple Outliers in Linear Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.