The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stochastic Population Forecasts for the United States: Beyond High, Medium, and Low
Abstract
Conventional population projections use “high,” “medium,” and “low” scenarios to indicate uncertainty, but probability interpretations are rarely given, and in any event the resulting ranges for vital rates, births, deaths, age groups sizes, age ratios, and population size cannot possibly be probabilistically consistent with one another. This article presents and implements a new method for making stochastic population forecasts that provide consistent probability intervals. We blend mathematical demography and statistical time series methods to estimate stochastic models of fertility and mortality based on U.S. data back to 1900 and then use the theory of random-matrix products to forecast various demographic measures and their associated probability intervals to the year 2065. Our expected total population sizes agree quite closely with the Census medium projections, and our 95 percent probability intervals are close to the Census high and low scenarios. But Census intervals in 2065 for ages 65+ are nearly three times as broad as ours, and for 85+ are nearly twice as broad. In contrast, our intervals for the total dependency and youth dependency ratios are more than twice as broad as theirs, and our ratio for the elderly dependency ratio is 12 times as great as theirs. These items have major implications for policy, and these contrasting indications of uncertainty clearly show the limitations of the conventional scenario-based methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
World population stabilization unlikely this century
Gerland, P., Raftery, A. E., Ševčíková, H., Li, N., Gu, D., Spoorenberg, T., Alkema, L., Fosdick, B. K., Chunn, J., Lalic, N., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257469 · Cited by 1,431
The end of world population growth
Lutz, W., Sanderson, W., & Scherbov, S. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35087589 · Cited by 639
A universal pattern of mortality decline in the G7 countries
Tuljapurkar, S., Li, N., & Boe, C. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015561 · Cited by 532
Self-citationThe outlook for population growth
Lee, R. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208859 · Cited by 415
Self-citationDemographic forecasting: 1980 to 2005 in review
Booth, H. (2006) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.04.001 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, R. D., & Tuljapurkar, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 428
- Pages
- 1175-1189
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2073626348
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic Population Forecasts for the United States: Beyond High, Medium, and Low. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476857
- The paper
- Lee, R. D., & Tuljapurkar, S. (1994). Stochastic Population Forecasts for the United States: Beyond High, Medium, and Low. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.